... Physical Therapists Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Postoperative Scars Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Health Sciences University of Indianapolis In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Health Science By: Elizabeth Geiger Harvey, PT, DPT, MSR, PCS Copyright April 4, 2024 By: Elizabeth Geiger Harvey, PT, DPT, MSR, PCS All rights reserved Approved by: Elizabeth S. Moore, PhD Committee Chair ______________________________ Heidi H. Ewen, PhD, FGSA, FAGHE Committee Member ______________________________ Esther de Ru, PT, OMT, PPT Committee Member ______________________________ Accepted by: Lisa Borrero, PhD, FAGHE Director, DHSc Program University of Indianapolis ______________________________ Stephanie Kelly, PT, PhD Dean, College of Health Sciences University of Indianapolis ______________________________ POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: Physical Therapists Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Postoperative Scars ...........................................................................................................................................7 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................................ 8 Purpose Statement ............................................................................................................................ 9 Significance of the Study ............................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 2: Literature Review .................................................................................................... 10 Scar Formation ................................................................................................................................ 13 Atrophic Scars ................................................................................................................... 13 Hypertrophic Scars............................................................................................................. 14 Keloid Scars....................................................................................................................... 15 Scar Treatments .............................................................................................................................. 15 Soft Tissue Massage .......................................................................................................... 16 Vibration Therapy .............................................................................................................. 17 Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Massage........................................................................... 17 Dry Needling ..................................................................................................................... 18 Tape ................................................................................................................................... 18 Topicals ............................................................................................................................. 19 Chapter 3: Method .................................................................................................................... 21 1 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Study Design ................................................................................................................................... 21 Participants ...................................................................................................................................... 21 Data .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Operational Definitions .................................................................................................................. 22 Instruments ...................................................................................................................................... 23 Procedures ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Recruitment ....................................................................................................................... 23 Informed Consent .............................................................................................................. 24 Data Collection .................................................................................................................. 24 Data Management .............................................................................................................. 25 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................. 25 Inferential Analyses ........................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 4: Results ..................................................................................................................... 26 Comparison of Knowledge Scores ................................................................................................ 26 Comparison of Attitude Scores ...................................................................................................... 28 Comparison of Practice Scores ...................................................................................................... 31 Comparison of Total Scores ........................................................................................................... 33 Chapter 5: Discussion ............................................................................................................... 36 Study Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 41 Implications ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Chpater 6: Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 44 References ................................................................................................................................ 46 2 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Abstract 3 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 4 Despite the high rate of complications and comorbidities that exist with postoperative scars, there is little evidence to demonstrate how physical therapists (PTs) in the United States (U.S.) perceive the relevance of this type of scar or how they are managed. This study examined PTs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to postoperative scars using a cross-sectional survey called the Postoperative Scar Survey. It was deployed February 21-March 3, 2023, to a convenience sample of PTs licensed in the U.S. In total, 750 completed surveys were used for data analysis. The primary outcomes were scores derived from knowledge, attitudes, and practices and a summed total score. A statistically significant difference was found in scar tissue engagement based on PT characteristics of sex, patient population, practice setting, region, specialty certification, and years of experience. PTs most engaged in scar tissue treatment were females, those with specialty certification in womens health, those practicing in a private outpatient setting in the Western U.S., and those treating a broad range of patients (both adult and pediatric). Over 81% (n = 572) agreed that postoperative scars should be evaluated by a PT, indicating a high awareness of the impact scars can have on patient outcomes. Patient disparities were found in the pediatric and geriatric populations and the military setting. This is the first survey to assess PTs engagement in postoperative scar tissue. Keywords: postoperative scar, physical therapy, linear scar, survey POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 5 Acknowledgments Nothing great is ever accomplished in isolation. Thank you, Dr. Moore, for acting as committee chair and helping me navigate the challenges of the doctoral project. I appreciate you helping me publish the first study on how sternotomy scars, left untreated, can impact motor development in pediatrics. Dr. Ewen, your early and continued support, as well as your personal interest in this topic led to the creation of the Postoperative Scar Survey. I appreciate the time and assistance you dedicated to making this project possible. Your patience, encouragement, and support have been unwavering. I will always be grateful for this opportunity to work with you. I didnt realize until our last conversation just how important this survey could be to my career. You are a statistics genius! Thank you for believing in me and seeing the big picture that I could not. Esther de Ru, this project would not have been possible without your expertise on the skin and your passion for making a difference in the world. Thank you. To the faculty- Dr. Santurri, Dr. Borrero, Dr. Gahimer, Dr. Nitche. I began this journey with high expectations, which has not disappointed me. I have gleaned so many personal and professional lessons from each of you. Thank you for the personal attention and dedication you have shown. The DHS program has fostered friendships, created growth, and offered new opportunities. A special thank you to Dr. Wakeford, who showed excessive patience and fortitude in guiding me through the ethics process. To those who worked tirelessly behind the scenes, most especially Teri Short and Dr. Wakeford. Your support for students does not go unnoticed. Much gratitude is extended to the UIndy Writing Lab, which helped me fine-tune my writing and offered personal encouragement. I am grateful to my professional colleagues who have supported me along this journey. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 6 Thank you, Judee Macias-Harris, for helping me understand the importance of scar tissue and the integumentary system. Thank you to Alison Taylor and Yichen Su for your tireless curiosity and dedication to changing the world as we know it! I stand among giants, and I am inspired. Thank you to Dr. Stephanie Phares and Earlene Masi for being my partners in the trenches of this journey and sticking with me to the end. You will always hold a special place in my heart! I cannot express my gratitude to my family, husband, three sons, parents and siblings, patients, and coworkers. Education has always been held in the highest regard and forever encouraged. Thank you for your patience and support throughout this entire endeavor. You have been the most patient and supportive of all. Thank you for always cheering me on and believing that I can make a difference in this world. Tracy Brandt, you prayed for me through many challenging times. Dora Brown, Laura Caddell, Leeanna McBee, and the Renewal Staff thank you for being patient and supportive during some trying times. Cujo, thank you for reminding me that there is more to life. You faithfully sat by my side for every assignment and edit. Without my patients, this journey would never have happened. Walking with you through trials and surgical procedures, you have shown me resilience and strength. Thank you for putting your faith in me and allowing me to help guide you through your healing process. You have taught me so much. I hope that together, we can change how scars are managed in the pediatric population. Finally, to God be the glory, great things He has done! He called me to this journey at UIndy and has sustained me. I pray that everything I do pleases Him and makes Him smile. He is so good to me! Elizabeth Geiger Harvey POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 7 Physical Therapists Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Postoperative Scars Scar tissue is the endpoint of soft tissue damage, including surgery or lesions. Despite advances in surgical techniques, postoperative scars or traumatic lacerations can cause dermal lesions that generate a significant patient burden (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022; Alvira-Lechuz et al., 2017; Andrews et al., 2016; Chamorro et al., 2017; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 2018; Coentro et al., 2019; Davies et al., 2017; Duquennoy-Martinot et al., 2016; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Fu et al., 2019; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Kelly et al., 2019; Krakowski et al., 2016; Lauridsen et al., 2014; Lyons et al., 2018; Ngaage & Agius, 2018; Nesbitt et al., 2017; Nischwitz et al., 2020; Olsson et al., 2018; Patel et al., 2014; Rabello et al., 2014; Scott et al., 2022; Sidgwick et al., 2015; Vuotto et al., 2018). Weiser et al. (2008) reported an incidence of 234 million surgical scars annually, with 100 million in the United States (U.S.) alone (Krakowski et al., 2016). Over 12 million traumatic lacerations occur yearly (Block et al., 2015). Of these injuries, 38-70% of the scars were estimated to become pathological (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022; Ferriero et al., 2015). Problematic scars can significantly impact on quality of life physically and psychologically (Davies et al., 2016; Duquennoy-Martinot et al., 2016; Fu et al., 2019; Gilbert et al., 2022; Gottrand et al., 2016; Kelly et al. 2019; Lee et al., 2018; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Olsson et al., 2018; Rullander, 2015; Vuotto et al., 2018; Wasserman et al., 2016). Frequent comorbidities are pain, tenderness, pruritus, nerve damage, contracture, poor thermoregulation, and decreased skin mobility (Alvira-Lechuz et al., 2017; Bae et al., 2015; Deflorin et al., 2020; Fu et al., 2019; Kelly et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2018; Krakowski et al., 2016; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Mundy et al., 2016; Rullander, 2015; Sidgwick et al., 2015; Uher et al., 2018; Vercelli et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020; Wasserman et al., 2016; Wilgus et al., 2020). These deficits can also POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 8 impact motor control (Alvira-Lechuz et al., 2017; Harvey, 2022; Le Touze et al., 2020; Matur, 2017; Takayuki & Ostry, 2010; Uher et al., 2018), which may be especially apparent in the pediatric population still in the process of motor development (Duquennoy-Martinot et al., 2016). Psychological consequences of scars can include social barriers (Duquennoy-Martinot et al., 2016; Gottrand et al., 2016; Krakowski et al., 2016; Olsson et al., 2018; Padilla-Espaa et al., 2014; Rullander, 2015; Sitohang et al., 2021; Vuotto et al., 2018), depression, anxiety, stigmatization, and decreased quality of life (Dastigir et al., 2021; Deflorin et al., 2020; Fu et al., 2019; Gottrand et al., 2016; Hambraeus et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2021; Krakowski et al., 2016; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Mundy et al., 2016; Ngaage & Agius, 2018; Olsson et al., 2018; Patel et al., 2014; Padilla-Espaa et al., 2014; Rullander, 2015; Sidgwick et al., 2015; Vercelli et al., 2015; Vuotto et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020; Wilgus et al., 2020). The emotional impact of scars can be as detrimental as chronic diseases such as diabetes, resulting in body dysmorphia and increased suicidal tendencies, especially in the pediatric population (Duquennoy-Martinot et al., 2016; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Padilla-Espaa et al., 2014; Patel et al., 2014; Rullander, 2015). Problem Statement Physical therapists often work with patients before and after surgery (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022; McClelland & Davidson, 2016). Scars' physical and psychological comorbidities are frequently underreported and overlooked by the medical community (Krakowski et al., 2016; Ngagge & Agius, 2018); however, patients spend over 20 billion dollars annually seeking treatment (Block et al., 2015). Conservative scar tissue treatment ranges from physical methods such as massage (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022; Crowle & Harley, 2020; Gottrand et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Masanovic, 2013; Poddighe et al., 2024; Scott et al., 2022; POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 9 Shin & Bordeaux, 2012; Wasserman et al., 2019; Wilk et al., 2015) to the use of topical agents (i.e., silicone sheets) (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022; Block et al., 2015; Deflorin et al., 2020; Fijan et al., 2019; Ocampo-Candiani et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2020). Despite this, there is little evidence in the literature on PTs' approach to postoperative scar tissue management (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022; Lubczyska et al., 2023). Purpose Statement Physical therapists minimize the importance of postoperative scars and do not regularly assess or treat postoperative scar tissue. This may be pronounced among different patient demographics (i.e., adult versus pediatric), which may be due to limited knowledge of evidencebased assessment and treatment methods. Additional variations in practice patterns may exist due to PT characteristics (i.e., sex, practice setting, geographic location). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to survey PTs in the U.S. to document their knowledge, attitudes, and practices of postoperative scar tissue. Research Question The research question was: What are PTs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding postoperative scar tissue, and how do they vary by PT characteristics? The following objectives were used to answer the research question. 1. To determine if PT's knowledge, as measured with the Postoperative Scar Survey, varied by sex, patient population, practice setting, U.S. region, and specialty certification. 2. To determine if attitude, as measured with the Postoperative Scar Survey, varied by sex, patient population, practice setting, U.S. region, and specialty certification. 3. To determine if practice, as measured with the Postoperative Scar Survey, varied by sex, patient population, practice setting, U.S. region, and specialty certification. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 10 4. To assess whether PTs' engagement in postoperative scar tissue, as measured with the Postoperative Scar Survey, varied by sex, patient population, practice setting, U.S. region, and specialty certification. It is expected that PTs minimize the importance of postoperative scars and do not regularly assess or treat them. Differences may be higher among patient characteristics, adult versus pediatric populations, or PT demographics, such as geographical location or experience level. This may be due to limited knowledge of evidence-based assessment and treatment methods or time restrictions placed on clinicians due to productivity demands. Significance of the Study With the high incidence of aberrant scars following surgery or lacerations, it is crucial to understand PTs' beliefs and practices regarding their treatment. Documenting this information may help develop specific evidence-based practice guidelines for practitioners and PT students. Exploring these aspects of patient care will aid in furthering research efforts. Literature Review The integumentary system is PTs' first and foremost point of contact with their patients. It is the largest organ and is highly innervated (Adameyko & Freid, 2016; Chapman & Moynihan, 2009; Nguyen & Soulika, 2019; Takayuki & Ostry, 2010; Tobin, 2006), comprising 6% of an individual's total weight (Tobin, 2006). The skin consists of two main layers. The epidermis is the outermost layer and is avascular (Harvey, 2018; Tobin, 2006). The inner layer is the dermis, which houses specialized sensory organs, the circulatory system, and superficial lymphatics (Harvey et al., 2017; Harvey, 2018; Tobin, 2006). During embryologic development, the ectoderm gives rise to the skin and other critical systems, such as the central and peripheral nervous systems. It is closely connected to the nervous system, thus called the outer brain POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 11 (Adameyko & Freid, 2016; Tobin, 2006) or the diffuse brain (Chapman & Moynihan, 2009). The skin is designed for protection and regulation. It protects against environmental pathogens, regulates body temperature, defends against ultraviolet radiation, and provides kinesthetic awareness through specialized sensory neurons, providing postural control and pain perception (Alviar-Lechuz et al., 2017; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Matur & ge, 2017; McGlone et al., 2014; Takayuki & Ostry, 2010; Tobin, 2006). It is described as the entry point to the central nervous system, capable of impacting perception, emotional regulation, and attentiveness (McGlone et al., 2014; Tobin, 2006). Cutaneous sensory nerves and free nerve endings deliver afferent information to the hypothalamus (Alviar-Lechuz et al., 2017; Tobin, 2006), and deficits in this information cause motor skill impairments (Matur, 2017). Damage to this system through trauma or surgery can cause aberrant wound healing, diminishing the system's effectiveness in functioning in these various capacities (Lubczyska et al., 2023; Nischwitz et al., 2020; O'Reilly et al., 2021; Rabello et al., 2014), which is to keep the system in homeostasis (Tobin, 2006). Scar tissue can adhere to underlying neural and myofascial structures, even deep into the organs (Alvira-Lechuz et al., 2017; Biology Dictionary, 2017; Bove et al., 2017; Lubczyska et al., 2023). Postoperative adhesions in the abdominal region (i.e., cesarean section) can lead to pathological attachments to the organs and bowels; however, immediate return to movement and manual therapy effectively prevent scar tissue adhesions (Bove et al., 2017; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Olszewska et al., 2023; Poddighe et al., 2024). Additionally, drainage or gastrointestinal tubes leave scars that penetrate deep into the viscera, often creating anxiety in patients and symptoms associated with tethering adhesions, including lymphatic chording (Chen et al., 2022; Nishioka et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021). Genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors can impact wound healing (Ogawa, 2021; Patel et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2020). Scars move through a typical recovery sequence, beginning POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 12 only 48 hours after injury (Sidgwick et al., 2015). These stages are the inflammatory phase, marked by coagulation at the wound site and release of immune cells, proliferation where new collagen binds the site together and remodel the skin, followed by the maturation phase, characterized by remodeling of the extracellular matrix (Patel et al., 2014; Nischwitz et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). These aberrant scars fall into the following categories: atrophic, hypertrophic, keloid, or mixed presentation (Lubczyska et al., 2023; Nischwitz et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2014; Rabello et al., 2014; Sitohang et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020). Up to 70% of postoperative scars are pathological (Ferrerio et al., 2015), usually due to prolonged inflammation of the reticular layer of the dermis (Nischwitz et al., 2020; Ogawa, 2021; Wang et al., 2020), which is exacerbated by excessive skin stretch (Lubczyska et al., 2023; Ogawa, 2021; O'Reilly et al., 2021). The many pathologies of scar tissue demand continuous evolution of evaluation and treatment methods to remedy the dysfunction scars can cause (DeFlorin et al., 2020; Ogawa, 2021; Vercelli et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020). Substantial evidence exists on the incidence and repercussions of postoperative scars. The physical and psychological impact of scar tissue evident in the literature (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 2018; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Krakowski et al., 2016; Lauridsen et al., 2014; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Ngaage & Agius, 2018; Nesbitt et al., 2017; Nischwitz et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2014; Rabello et al., 2014; Sidgwick et al., 2015). There are also recommendations for evaluating and treating postoperative scars, but few articles indicate PTs practice patterns. A recent study from Poland cites the goal of manual work as limiting pain and reducing functional limitations (Lubczyska et al., 2023). Over 1,400 articles published in the last ten years review how PTs manage burn scars; however, the literature lacks research indicating how PTs clinically address postoperative scars. Although there is a strong emphasis on POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 13 wound care curricula (Gibbs et al., 2019; Gibbs & Furney, 2013), little is known about evidencebased physical therapy practice for scar management. Many linear scar assessment methods and conservative treatment approaches are available to PTs with various levels of efficacy, but their use in rehabilitation is not well documented. Scar Formation A scar is a natural product of the integumentary system closing a wound; however, as stated before, this process often becomes aberrant (Coentro et al., 2019; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022). Pathological scars can come in many forms many types of scar tissue, such as atrophic, hypertrophic, or keloids (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Nischwitz et al., 2020; Ogawa, 2022; Patel et al., 2014; Sidgwick et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020). Environmental and genetic factors can impact the wound-healing process. Pathologic scars can lead to physical comorbidities such as contracture (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 2018; Krakowski et al., 2016; Patel et al., 2014), discoloration, pruritis, chronic pain (Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Lauridsen et al., 2014; Ngaage & Agius, 2018; Nesbitt et al., 2017; Nischwitz et al., 2020; Rabello et al., 2014; Sidgwick et al., 2015). Abdominal adhesions can also form postoperatively, causing infertility, bowel obstruction, and pain (Bove et al., 2017; Alvira-Lechuz et al., 2017; Biology Dictionary, 2017). Atrophic Scars Atrophic scars are defined as thinning or a loss of collagen in the epidermal layer, creating a depression in the skin (Patel et al., 2014; Sitohang et al., 2021). Traction occurs from the loss of elastin, collagen, and dermal fat, resulting in skin depression such as a divot (Patel et al., 2014). These scars typically arise from acne; other causes of cutaneous cellular damage include cysts, burns, and surgery (Patel et al., 2014; Sitohang et al., 2021). Patients are more at POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 14 risk of developing atrophic scars if they have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, macular atrophy, or previous episodes of atrophic scars (Patel et al., 2014). Closing a wound with sutures can cause this type of scar. Hypertrophic Scars Hypertrophic scars are a global problem with impacts such as contractures and decreased function (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Nischwitz et al., 2020; O'Reilly et al., 2021; Rabello et al., 2014). They are more prevalent in people 10-30 years old due to increased elastin and skin tension, higher collagen production, and greater risk of trauma (Rabello et al., 2014). This scar tissue comprises Type III collagen and is characterized by raised tissue, no more than 4 mm, that is contracted, discolored (e.g., red or pink), and does not extend beyond the original boundaries of the wound (Rabello et al., 2014). Angiogenesis creates vertically oriented blood vessels in the dermal layer, adding to the color and raised presentation (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Nischwitz et al., 2020; Rabello et al., 2014). These are also more likely to occur if the incision runs perpendicular to the Langer lines or the skin's natural tension lines, such as at the sternum (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022). Surgeons carefully consider these tension lines when planning a procedure, as they can significantly impact healing. For example, this is why cesarean incisions are performed horizontally rather than vertically when planned. It is also why incisions following median sternotomy are often problematic (Harvey, 2022). The main symptoms following surgery are pruritis, pain, erythematous or dilation of the blood vessels (Rabello et al., 2014). Keloid Scars The most aggressive pathological scars are keloids, which have a strong genetic component (Huang & Ogawa, 2021; Ogawa, 2022) and are ubiquitous following surgery (Huang & Ogawa, 2021). Lubczyska et al. (2023) reported an incidence of 4.5-6%. The recurrence rate POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 15 after surgical revision ranges from 40-100%, depending on the location and inherent risk (Sidgwick et al., 2015). These scars are more common in those with darker skin, Fitzpatrick scale III-V (e.g., 10 to 16%) (Ogawa, 2022; Rabello et al., 2014), women, especially if pregnant (Ogawa, 2022), and those with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (Ogawa, 2022). They extend beyond the borders to invade surrounding tissue and appear shiny and discolored (e.g., pink, purple, or brown) (Nischwitz et al., 2020; Ogawa, 2022; Rabello et al., 2014). Keloids consist of irregular type I and II collagen from extended inflammation and overactive myofibroblasts (Nischwitz et al., 2020; Rabello et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2020). Scars are exacerbated by excessive skin tension during the healing process, leading to increased keloids on the knees, elbows, lower abdominal region, scapular region, and chest wall (Hosseini et al., 2022; Huang & Ogawa, 2021; Moorgat et al., 2015; Ogawa, 2022; Sidgwick et al., 2015). Scar Treatments Assessment is the first step to appropriate intervention. The assessment can inform the selected treatment intervention based on the wound healing stage and patient goals. The goal of postoperative scar management is to return the patient to their pre-operative function and attend to the somatopsychic consequences of the scar (Gottrand et al., 2018; Lubczyska et al., 2023). Conservative scar tissue treatment ranges from physical techniques to topical agents (AbdElseyad et al., 2022; Block et al., 2015; Dastagir et al., 2021; Deflorin et al., 2020; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Shin & Bordeaux, 2011; Wasserman et al., 2019). Many studies advocate a multi-modality approach to scar management rather than one gold standard for intervention (Lubczyska et al., 2023). Techniques for treating scar tissue include soft tissue massage (STM), instrument-assisted soft tissue massage (IASTM), dry needling, tape, topicals, and phototherapy. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 16 Soft Tissue Massage Non-invasive manual techniques such as scar massage have strong efficacy in decreasing symptoms of acute and chronic postoperative scar adhesions, such as improved tissue mobility, posture, range of motion, pressure tolerance, decreased pelvic organ prolapse, and reduced pain (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022; Bove et al., 2017; Crowle & Harley, 2020; Deflorin et al., 2020; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Olszewska et al., 2023; Poddighe et al., 2024; Scott et al., 2022; Wasserman et al., 2019). Scar massage, performed either with the hands or a tool, increases circulation and adds physical pressure, producing non-nociceptor stimulation, which decreases pain (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022; Deflorin et al., 2020; Gilbert et al., 2022; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Karwacinska et al., 2012; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Olszewska et al., 2023; Poddighe et al., 2024; Scott et al., 2022; Shin & Boardeaux, 2011; Wasserman et al., 2019). Another form of mechanical massage is vacuum massage, or cupping (Moortgat et al., 2016; Moortgat et al., 2020). This treatment uses suction to lift the scarred skin to mobilize a skin fold and has been shown to improve the elasticity and texture of scars, especially burns (Moortgat et al., 2016; Moortgat et al., 2020). This therapy increases the number of fibroblasts and collagen fibers and their orientation (Moortgat et al., 2016; Moortgat et al., 2020). Cesarean section and mastectomy scars have shown an excellent response to STM, effectively reducing many comorbidities of scar tissue (Comesaa et al., 2017; Crowle & Harley, 2020; Gilbert et al., 2022; Kelly et al., 2019; Kelly-Martin et al., 2018; Koller, 2020; Kramp, 2012; Martingano, 2016; Olszewska et al., 2023). If a patient is at risk of keloid scarring, additional tension to the scar is contraindicated (Hosseini et al., 2022; Moorgat et al., 2015; Ogawa, 2022). POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 17 Vibration Therapy Focal vibration (FV), a form of IASTM, is direct soundwave therapy applied to a target tissue (Brewin et al., 2017; Celletti et al., 2017; Uher et al., 2018; Vegar & Imtiyaz, 2014). FV creates a vibratory force through mechanical or battery-operated frequencies (Brewin et al., 2017). Two of the best-documented benefits of FV are pain relief (Barati et al., 2021; Celletti et al., 2017; Feltroni et al., 2018; Garcia et al., 2022; Manfredi, 2012; Uher et al., 2018) and increased local circulation (Ballard et al., 2019; Imtiyaz et al., 2017; Nakagami et al., 2007; Uher et al., 2018). It may be preferred to STM as five minutes of FV is equivalent to 15 minutes of STM (Imtiyaz et al., 2017; Pastouret et al., 2016), increasing local skin circulation through vasodilation (Imtiyaz et al., 2017; Nakagami et al., 2007; Pastouret et al., 2016). Vibration therapy may decrease pain by increasing oxygen and improving lymphatic flow, thus decreasing cytokines (Veqar & Imtiyaz, 2014). Celletti et al. (2017) have shown that this therapy may effectively regain upper limb function post-mastectomy. Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Massage Instrument-assisted soft tissue massage (IASTM) is a popular soft tissue adhesion treatment with short-term benefits (Cheatham et al., 2016; Seffrin et al., 2019). Focal vibration is another form of IASTM that uses mechanical frequencies to impact scar tissue (Brewin et al., 2017). Vibration has the advantage that 5 minutes is equivalent to 15 minutes of massage (Imtiyaz et al., 2017). Dry Needling Dry needling is within the scope of practice of physical therapists in many states and is used to decrease pain and improve the appearance of scars (Dunning et al., 2014; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Rozenfeld et al., 2020). A systematic review shows that this non-ablative technique offers promising results for treating all scar types and is safe (Alster & Li, 2020; Bonati et al., POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 18 2017; Cohen & Elbuluk, 2016; Al-Qarqaz & Al-Yousef, 2018; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Ramaut et al., 2018; Sitohang et al., 2021). This process uses tiny, sterile needles to stimulate collagen production by provoking an increase in growth factor and elastin in the dermal vasculature systems (Sitohang et al., 2021). Some studies show effectiveness in persons with darker skin with minimal side effects (Alster & Li, 2020; Al-Qarqaz & Al-Yousef, 2018; Lubczyska et al., 2023). Caution is advised as other reviews associate this treatment with the risk of prolonged recovery time, discoloration, and scarring (Cohen & Elbuluk, 2016). Tape Elastic tapes (e.g., Kinesio tape) are a newer modality with preliminary evidence of scar improvement across different populations and remodeling stages (Cheatham et al., 2021; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Harvey, 2022; Karwacinska et al., 2012; Lubczyska et al., 2023; O'Reilly et al., 2021; Prusinowska et al., 2014). Elastic tapes only deform longitudinally; thus, a potential mechanism of action is a lift in the superficial fascia while limiting tension across the scar edges (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Hosseini et al., 2022; Ishii et al., 2021; Lemos et al., 2014; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Moorgat et al., 2015; Tu et al., 2016). Biomechanical tension causes compression; this stimulates a biochemical response to increase collagen production (Hosseini et al., 2022; Moorgat et al., 2015). Windisch et al. (2017) showed a localized increase in superficial circulation following total knee replacement. Another study showed decreased pain and opioid use following median sternotomy (Klein et al., 2015; Brockman & Klein, 2018). In a recent survey, 74% of rehabilitation clinicians use Kinesio tape for post-injury applications, believing that it stimulates mechanoreceptors (77%), improves circulation (69%), and modulates pain (60%) (Cheatham et al., 2021). Additionally, paper tape is helpful for POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 19 abdominal or truncal scars to prevent shearing, which can lead to hypertrophic or keloid formation (Atkinson et al., 2005; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Ishii et al., 2021; Lubczyska et al., 2023; O'Reilly et al., 2021). According to Ishii et al. (2021), woven tapes show better efficacy than paper tape in postoperative scars, possibly due to moisture permeability. Topicals Common topical agents for surgical scar remodeling are onion extract and silicone sheeting, which have solid preliminary efficacy, especially for the prevention of keloid scars (Block et al., 2015; Deflorin et al., 2020; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Jiang et al., 2021; Sidgwick et al., 2015; Wananukul et al., 2013; Ward et al., 2019; Zoumalan, 2018). Silicone gel is made of chains that combine oxygen and silicon atoms, which may help hydrate the skin (Ward et al., 2019). Onion extract application improves erythema, pruritis, and pliability with fewer side effects than corticosteroid injections (Zoumalan, 2018). It should be noted that it can cause localized skin irritation (Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020). Overall, the current evidence is low for silicone gel sheets have shown high efficacy in changing the volume, elasticity, color, and firmness in hypertrophic scars and keloids (Block et al., 2015; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Jiang et al., 2021; Ward et al., 2019). The mechanism may be that it provides a seal, thus improving hydration to the stratum corneum and affecting fibroblast activity (Block et al., 2015; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020; Jiang et al., 2021). Lin et al. (2020) demonstrated it to be more advantageous than paper tapes, while Jiang et al. (2021) have shown it slightly more effective than onion extract. Vitamin E, when applied topically to the wound, may provide antioxidants that help with wound healing (Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020). A typical medium for vitamin E is Aquaphor, as POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 20 pure vitamin E can cause contact dermatitis (Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020). While there is little definitive evidence for its efficacy with postoperative scars, it may decrease inflammation by reducing fibroblastic activity (Grigoryan & Kampp, 2020). General guidelines for the prevention of further damage from ultraviolet light can occur through the regular use of sunscreen (>50 SPF) on scarred skin (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022). This should be observed throughout the maturation process to decrease the melanoma risk and hyperpigmentation and improve overall cosmesis (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022), PhotoTherapy Light-emitting diode (LED), also known as low-level laser or photobiomodulation, has come to the forefront as a non-invasive approach to treating scar tissue (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Fernndez-Guarino et al., 2023). Postoperative hypertrophic and keloid scars are exceptionally responsive to LED treatment, with less stiffness and volume after treatment with less recurrence (Deflorin et al., 2020; Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Fernndez-Guarino et al., 2023; Fu et al., 2019; Kurtii et al., 2021; Mamalis et al., 2014). The primary mechanism of action is the modification of fibroblastic activity (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Fernndez-Guarino et al., 2023; Fu et al., 2019; Mamalis et al., 2014) or an overall decreased scar tissue vascularity, which reduces cytokines and growth factor levels (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022). LED therapy is low-risk and cost-effective (Eid & Abdelbasset, 2022; Fernndez-Guarino et al., 2023; Fu et al., 2019; Kurtii et al., 2021; Mamalis et al., 2014). Method Study Design This study was a quantitative, non-experimental research using a cross-sectional design. The Postoperative Scar Survey was the instrument used to assess PTs' knowledge, attitudes, and POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 21 practices regarding postoperative scar tissue. The survey used Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The survey was open from February 21 to March 3, 2023. The University of Indianapolis Institutional Review Board approved the study (Uindy IRB #01827) Participants The population of interest was PTs licensed to practice in the U.S. Convenience sampling was used to identify potential study participants. For inclusion in the study, the participant had to be a PT licensed in the U.S. and be able to read English. Exclusion criteria included a) physical therapy students b) other rehabilitation professionals. Sample Size. A sample size estimate was calculated using G*Power 3.1. The calculation was based on conducting a two-tailed independent t-test with the following parameters: medium effect size of 0.50, an alpha of .05, power of 0.8, and a 1:1 allocation ratio. Based on these parameters, a minimum sample size of 128 and group sizes of 64 were needed. A larger sample size was collected to increase the likelihood that the results could be generalizable to PTs practicing in the U.S. Data The following demographic data were collected: sex (male, female, other) practice setting (private outpatient clinic, public outpatient clinic (i.e., state, county), hospital-based facility, skilled nursing facility, home health, academic/research institution, military facility, industrial/occupational health services, outpatient pediatrics, early intervention) patient population (adults, pediatrics, both adult and pediatric patients) POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 22 specialty certification (none, cardiovascular or pulmonary, clinical electrophysiology, geriatrics, pediatric, neurology, oncology, orthopedics, sports, women's health, wound management) number of years in PT practice (listed in five-year increments up to >30) primary practice region (i.e., South, Northeast, West, Midwest) Study outcomes were derived from knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) scores as measured with the Postoperative Scar Survey. Operational Definitions The concepts of KAP scores were operationalized as domain scores obtained from the Postoperative Scar Survey (Harvey et al., in progress). The domain scores were summed up to a total score that measures a PTs engagement in scar tissue. The higher the score, the more engaged a therapist is towards scars. Knowledge: A PT's understanding of the concept of postoperative scar treatment, comorbidities of postoperative scars, and its importance to overall health Attitude: How a PT thinks, feels, or acts regarding postoperative scars, which may be influenced by values and understanding Practice: The action a PT takes to evaluate and treat postoperative scar tissue Instruments The Postoperative Scar Survey measures PTs' knowledge of postoperative scar tissue assessment and treatment strategies, attitudes toward treating scars, and practice patterns. The revised survey consists of 45 items. Reliability through factor analysis was as follows: knowledge ( .82) with ten items, attitude ( .79) containing seven items, and practices ( .80) with nine items (Harvey et al., in progress). The Postoperative Scar Survey elicited three content domains that represent PTs KAP. The domains consist of items with true/false and Likert scale POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 23 responses having a higher value and negative responses with a lower value. Before scoring, negatively worded items were coded or reverse coded, as indicated, and then summed. The summation of the direct and reverse scores of the summed domains estimates how engaged or disengaged the individual is regarding postoperative scar treatment and was analyzed. Higher scores indicate more engagement, and lower scores indicate less engagement. Each domain was assessed individually, then summed for a total score and evaluated for differences among stated PT characteristics. The instrument is available upon request. Procedures Recruitment Multimodal recruitment strategies were used. The primary researcher (E. H.) actively recruited PTs at the 2023 APTA Combined Sections Meeting (CSM) by handing out flyers with survey QR codes generated through Qualtrics, beginning on February 21, 2023. After the conference, the survey link was posted on professional social media sites such as Facebook groups for PTs and the special interest groups for each section of the APTA. Incentives were offered in the form of a drawing for one of five $20 Amazon gift cards. Participants who wanted to participate in the drawing were allowed to sign up at the end of the survey. Informed Consent Informed consent was required for participation. The informed consent document was the landing page when an individual used the QR code or the link to access the survey. Participants could not proceed to the study without giving informed consent. No vulnerable populations or psychologically harmful events were anticipated from survey participation (Manti & Licari, 2018). POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 24 Data Collection Data were collected digitally through Qualtrics. A captcha was used to ensure that robots did not infiltrate the survey. The primary researcher actively recruited participants from different specialty groups during the APTA CSM to ensure equal opportunity for each group to be represented in the survey. The primary researcher closed the survey on March 3, 2023, as a sufficient sample size had been obtained. A separate Qualtrics survey was created to collect information for those wishing to participate in the drawing for five $20 Amazon gift certificates. Individuals who completed the survey and wanted to participate in the drawing were directed to a new survey page not linked to the Postoperative Scar Survey, where they could agree to be in the drawing. An incentive statement was included to inform participants of participation parameters so they understood they would not be compensated for participating in this study. Participants were asked to include their email addresses when distributing the electronic Amazon gift card if they were selected to receive it. A random number generator was used to draw participant names for the five gift cards after the study and emailed to the winners. Data Management Data from Qualtrics were exported into a data analysis file, where it was explored for missing data and manipulated to calculate instrument scores. Data were de-identified by deleting IP addresses, and geotags documenting geocoordinates were removed. All electronic files were located on a password-protected computer. The primary researcher will retain a copy of the clean data for up to ten years to allow for the publication of findings. At the end of this time, files will be destroyed. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 25 Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample and report the outcomes. Nominal data was reported as frequencies and percentages, while normally distributed interval and ratio data were stated as means and standard deviations. The normality of data was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test and visual inspection of histograms, box plots, and Q-Q plots. Inferential Analyses Inferential statistical analysis was used to determine if there were differences in PTs' KAP and total scores by provider characteristics. An independent t-test was used to determine if there were significant differences in knowledge scores by sex. In contrast, one-way ANOVA tests were used to compare the following practice characteristics: patient population, years of experience, specialty area board certification, primary U.S. region of practice, and primary practice setting. If a one-way ANOVA result was statistically significant, Bonferroni or Tamhanes T2 post hoc tests were used to determine the statistically significant pairwise comparisons. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). All comparisons were two-tailed, and a significance level of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 958 individuals responded to the survey. Of those, 945 gave informed consent to participate in the study. Listwise deletion was performed only to include complete survey responses, leaving 750 participants. Nearly equal numbers of males and females completed the survey, and over half of the participants had ten or fewer years of experience (55.9%). Most participants worked with adult patients (42.9%); the highest reported practice setting was early POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 26 intervention (20.7%). Most practiced in the Midwest (29.9%). See Table 1 for more descriptive characteristics of the sample. Comparison of Knowledge Scores Objective 1 was to determine if knowledge scores varied by sex, patient population, practice setting, U.S. demographics, and specialty certification. An independent samples t-test was used to investigate differences in knowledge by sex. There was a statistically significant difference in knowledge scores between males and females, with females having greater scores on knowledge t(2, 750 = -8.23, p <.001. One-way ANOVA tests were used to assess differences in knowledge among the therapist specialties, practice locations, patient populations, and years of experience. These results are presented in Table 2. There was a statistically significant difference in mean knowledge scores by patient population, F(2, 731) = 34.93, p < .001. Tamhane T2 post hoc tests showed that PTs who worked with pediatric patients differed significantly and had lower mean knowledge scores than those who treated pediatric and adult patients or those who treated adult patients only. There was a mean difference between those working with pediatrics and those working with adults of 0.88 (p < .001) and those working with a mixed population by 0.69 (p < .001). This suggests that those with a diverse patient population have a better understanding of scar tissue. Significant differences were found in years of experience F(6, 754) = 5.41, p < .001. Tamhane T2 post hoc tests showed significant mean difference of 1.48 between PTs with 30 years or more experience and those with < five years of experience (p < .001) mean difference of 1.28 (p = .01) with those with six to ten years of experience, mean difference of 1.79 (p < .001) with those who have 11 to 15 years of experience, and a mean difference of 1.66 (p = .003) with those POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 27 who have 16-20 years of experience. There was no significant mean difference between those with >30 years of experience and those with 21-25 or 26-30 years. Thus, those with at least 21 years of experience understand scar tissue assessments and treatments more. Regional differences were also seen in knowledge scores, F(3, 758) = 2.86, p < .004. Practitioners in the Western U.S. had the highest mean knowledge score, and Bonferroni post hoc tests showed the mean differed significantly from the Northeast by 0.58 (p = .05). There were no other significant differences between regions comparisons. Significant differences were found among specialty certifications with F(10, 739) = 11.95, p < .001. Women's health specialists scored the highest, indicating more knowledge regarding post-operative scar tissue. Tamhane post hoc tests show that the mean score differs significantly from cardiology/pulmonary by 1.81 (p < .001), from clinical electrophysiology by 1.62 (p < .001), geriatrics by 2.41 (p < .001), pediatrics by 1.62 (p < .001), neurology by 2.34 (p < .001), oncology by 1.76 (p < .001), orthopedics by 1.37 (p = .004), sports by 1.78 (p < .001), and wound care by 1.06 (p = .02). Wound management had the second-highest score. It differed significantly from those without specialty certification with a mean difference of -0.85 (p = .004), geriatrics by a difference of 1.35 (p < .001), neurology by 1.31 (p < .001), and womens health by -1.06 (p = .02). Geriatrics had the lowest mean score. This indicates that those with specialty certification in womens health and wound management have the greatest understanding of assessment and treatment options for postoperative scar tissue. Significant differences were found among practice settings, F(8, 752) = 10.58, p < .001. PTs in the private outpatient setting scored the highest. Mean knowledge scores above five were seen in all settings except military facilities. (See Figure 1). Bonferroni post hoc tests showed that mean knowledge scores among PTs in private outpatient differed significantly from early POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 28 intervention by 1.63 (p < .001), home health by 1.55 (p < .001), the military setting by 1.99 (p < .001), and occupational health by 1.43 (p < .001). Those in the public outpatient setting held the second highest score, and mean scores differed significantly from the early interventional setting by 1.39 (p < .001), home health by 1.36 (p < .001), occupational health by 1.21 (p = .02), and the military setting by 1.76 (p < .001). Both outpatient settings hold the highest mean knowledge scores, while the military setting scored the lowest among all settings. The military, early intervention, occupational, and home health settings scored the lowest mean score, with the military having the lowest score (See Figure 2). Thus, those in outpatient practice settings better understand post-operative scars than those in other settings. Comparison of Attitude Scores Objective 2 was determining if attitude scores varied by sex, patient population, practice setting, U.S. demographics, and specialty certification. An independent samples t-test was used to investigate differences in attitude scores by sex. There were statistically significant differences in attitude scores by sex, with females having a higher score, t(736.36) = -9.27, p < .001. One-way ANOVA tests were used to determine differences among therapists by patient population, years in practice, specialty area board certification, primary U.S. region of practice, and primary practice setting. These results are presented in Table 3. There were statistically significant differences in attitude scores by patient population, F(2, 741) = 19.75, p < .002. Tamhane T2 post hoc tests showed significant differences between PTs treating adults and those treating pediatric patients, with a mean difference of 3.78 (p < .001). There was also a significant mean difference between those treating a diverse population of adult and pediatric patients and those only treating pediatrics, with a difference of -2.68 (p < .001). Those PTs working only with pediatric patients had the lowest mean scores. No other significant differences were found in post POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 29 hoc tests. This signifies that those who treat adults feel more strongly about treating scars than those who treat children. Significant differences were found in years of practice with F(6, 754) = 5.01, p < .001. Tamhane T2 post hoc tests show differences between 30+ years of experience and those with 0 to 5 years with a mean difference of 6.00 (p < .001), those with 6 to 10 years of experience with a mean difference of 6.21 (p < .001), 11-15 years of experience with a mean difference of 7.36 (p < .001), 16 to 20 years of experience with a difference of 6.48 (p < .001), 21-25 years of experience with a mean difference of 5.91 (p < .001)but no difference with those with 26 to 30 years. Thus, those with more than 26 years of experience have more favorable attitudes toward treating post-operative scars. Significant differences were found among specialty certifications with F(10, 728) = 15.21, p < .001. The highest attitude score was among those without certification, and the lowest was in geriatrics. Tamhane post hoc tests show that those with no certification differ from all other certifications and have more positive attitudes toward scar treatment. Post hoc tests showed that the mean difference between those PTs without specialty certification and cardiology/pulmonary by 6.07 (p < .001), clinical electrophysiology by 6.22 (p < .001), geriatrics by 7.11 (p < .001), pediatric specialists by 5.06 (p < .001), neurology specialists by 5.35 (p < .001), orthopedics by 4.07 (p < .001), sports by 4.88 (p < .001), and wound by 2.39 (p = .003), but not from women's health. Those specializing in womens health and wound management had higher mean scores than other specialties. Therefore, more positive attitudes toward treating postoperative scars were those without specialty certification and in womens health. Statistically significant differences were found using mean attitude scores with equal variances among practice regions within the U.S. F(3,746) = 5.87, p < .001. Bonferroni post hoc POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 30 tests show that the Western region differed from the Midwest by 2.45 (p < .001), with the Western region having the highest mean score. There was no difference between the other regions. Statistically significant differences were found in the mean attitude score among practice settings with F(8,740) = 16.71, p < .001. The private outpatient setting held the highest mean score, and the military setting had the lowest. Mean attitude scores above 30 were seen in public and private outpatient clinics, hospital-based facilities, and academic research institutions. Scores below 25 were only found among those who worked in military facilities, and this group had lower scores than all other settings. (See Figure 3). Tamhane post hoc tests show that the mean scores of PTs in private outpatient settings differed significantly from those in early intervention by 5.24 (p < .001), home health by 4.94 (p < .001), military setting by 7.90 (p < .001), and occupational health by 4.38 (p < .001), but did not differ from public outpatient or SNFs. The military setting had the lowest mean score, and post hoc tests showed that they differed significantly from every other setting. It differs from the academic setting by -6.13, from early intervention by -2.66 (p = .036), from hospital setting by -6.67 (p < .001), home health by -2.96 (p = .014), occupational health by -3.52 (p = .003), private outpatient by -7.90 (p < .001), public outpatient by -6.81 (p < .001), and SNF by -5.92 (p < .001). Thus, those in the private outpatient setting have the highest beliefs and attitudes toward managing scars. Comparison of Practice Scores Objective 3 was to determine if practice scores varied by sex, patient population, practice setting, years of experience, U.S. demographics, and specialty certification. An independent samples t-test was used to investigate differences in practice by sex. Results show no statistically significant differences in practice scores by sex t(-.725) = -0.55, p = .136. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 31 One-way ANOVA tests were used to determine differences among therapists by patient population, years in practice, specialty area board certification, primary U.S. region of practice, and primary practice setting. These results are presented in Table 4. Statistically significant differences were found among patient populations, with the highest scores among PTs who practice with adults and pediatrics having the highest mean score, while the lowest scores were among those practicing exclusively with pediatric populations F(7, 736) = 35.39, p < .001. Post hoc Bonferonni tests show that those working with adults differ from those PTs working with pediatric patients by 2.77 (p < .001) and those working with a diverse population by -2.15 (p < .001). Statistically significant differences in practice scores were found among PTs based on years of experience, F(6, 738) = 6.01, p < .001. The highest practice scores were in the group with the least experience (0 to 5 years). Bonferroni posthoc tests show that this mean score was significantly higher than those with the lowest two scores: PTs with 11 to 15 years with a mean difference of 3.25 (p < .001) and 16 to 20 with a difference of 3.61 (p < .001) years of practice. No significant difference existed between those with 0 to 5 years of experience and all other groups. Statistically significant differences were found among the mean average with equal variances among specialty certifications, F(6, 719) = 6.22, p < .001. Womens health, wound management, and sports specialists had the highest mean practice scores (see Figure 5). Tamhane post hoc tests show that those with women's health certification differ significantly from those without specialty certification by 5.37 (p < .001), from cardiology/pulmonology certification by 5.66 (p < .001), clinical electrophysiology by 4.97 (p < .001), from geriatric specialists by 7.99 (p < .001), from pediatric specialists by 5.25 (p < .001), neurology by 4.97 (p < .001), oncology POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 32 specialists by 6.23 (p < .001), and orthopedic specialists by 5.63 (p < .001), but not from wound management or sports specialists. Those with wound management certification differ from those without specialty certification by 5.09 (p < .001), from cardiology/pulmonology specialists by 5.39 (p < .001), from clinical electrophysiology by 4.53 (p < .001), from geriatric specialists by 7.7 (p < .001), from pediatrics by 4.98 (p < .001), from neurology specialists by 4.69 (p <. 001), oncology by 5.96 (p < .001), orthopedic specialists by 5.36 (p< .001), but did not differ from womens health or sports specialists. Geriatric and oncology specialists had the lowest mean scores. Thus, those with womens health or wound management certification are more engaged with assessing and treating scars. Statistically significant differences were found in practice scores among primary regions of practice, F(3, 736) = 6.51, p < .001. Tamhane post hoc tests show that the Western U.S. held the highest mean score and differs from the Midwest by 1.64 (p < .02), and the Northeast differs from the Midwest by 1.79 (p = .01) (See Table 4). Statistically significant differences were found among practice scores in the practice setting, F(8, 735) = 9.59, p < .001. The highest mean practice scores were among PTs in skilled nursing facilities (SNF), followed by public and private outpatient clinics; the lowest was among those in early intervention and military facilities (See Figure 6). Tamhane post hoc tests show that mean practice scores for those SNFs differed significantly from early intervention by 4.99 (p < .001), hospital setting by 2.56 (p = .004), home health by 3.42 (p = .006), and military setting by 6.47 (p < .001), but did not differ from the other settings. The mean scores for PTs working in military settings were the lowest. Post hoc tests showed that the mean score for PTs in the military setting differed significantly from those in an academic setting by -4.82 (p < .001), hospital setting by -3.90 (p = .002), occupational health by -5.59, private outpatient by -6.09 (p < POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 33 .001), public outpatient by -6.31 (p < .001), and SNF by -6.47 (p < .001), but did not differ from early intervention or home health settings. This means that those in the SNF setting assess and treat scars the most, while PTs in the military settings evaluate and treat the least. Comparison of Total Scores The fourth objective was to determine if total scores varied by sex, patient population, practice setting, years of experience, U.S. demographics, and specialty certification. An independent samples t-test was used to investigate differences in practice by sex. There was a statistically significant difference in practice scores by sex, t(738) = -6.42, p < .001, with females having the highest score. ANOVA tests were used to determine differences among therapists by patient population, years in practice, specialty area board certification, years of experience, primary U.S. region of practice, and primary practice setting. These results are presented in Table 5. There were statistically significant differences in total scores by patient population, but variances were not equal, F(2, 731) = 34.93, p < .001. The highest mean score was among PTs treating both adult and pediatric patients. PTs working with adults only had the next highest score, and pediatric therapists had the lowest total score. Tamhane T 2 post hoc tests show that PTs working with adults only differ significantly from those working with pediatrics by 7.03 (p < .001) but did not differ from those working with a diverse population. Those working with pediatrics differed from those working with a diverse population by -8.51 (p < .001). Thus, those treating adults are more engaged with post-operative scar management. Statistically significant differences were found in years of practice, but unequal variance, F(6,733) = 5.53, p < .001. PTs with more than 30 years of experience had the highest mean total score, while those with 11 to 15 years of experience had the lowest (see Table ). Tamhane post POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 34 hoc tests show that those with more than 30 years of experience differ significantly from those with 11 to 15 years by 10.00 (p < .001) and those with 16 to 20 years of experience by 9.52 (p = .006) but did not differ from all others. This implies that those with more than 30 years of experience are the most engaged with scar management. Statistically significant differences were found among specialty certifications but unequal variances, F(10, 718) = 15.25, p < .001 (see Figure 7). Those with women's health certification had the highest mean score, followed closely by those with wound care certification, each having a score greater than 70 (see Table 5). Tamhane post hoc tests show that those with specialty certification in womens health differ from cardiology/pulmonology by 13.26 (p < .001), clinical electrophysiology by 12.00 (p < .001), geriatric specialists mean score by 16.99 (p < .001), pediatric by 11.68 (p < .001), neurology by 12.37 (p < .001), oncology by 13.05 (p < .001), orthopedics by 10.76 (p < .001), and sports specialists by 8.58, but not wound care specialists. Those with wound care specialty differed significantly from those with cardiology/pulmonology by 9.88 (p < .001), clinical electrophysiology by 8.62 (p < .001), geriatric specialists by 13.60 (p < .001), pediatric specialists by 8.29 (p < .001), neurology by 8.98 (p < .001), oncology by 9.67 (p < .001), and orthopedic specialists by 7.37 (p < .001), but not sports, women's health, or those without specialty certification. This indicates that these groups have a higher overall engagement with post-operative scars. The lowest score was among those with geriatric certification. Statistically significant differences were found among the primary region of practice, but variances were not equal, F(3, 736) = 6.51, p < .001. Tamhane post hoc analysis showed that the West differed from the Midwest by 4.82 (p < .001). No other regions differed significantly from one another. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 35 Statistically significant differences were found among primary practice settings, but variances were unequal, F(8, 730) = 18.14, p < .001. The highest mean total score was among PTs in the private outpatient setting, with the lowest in the military facilities. Tamhane post hoc tests show that the private outpatient setting differed significantly from early intervention by 11.64 (p < .001), the hospital setting by 4.16 (p = .016), home health by 9.68 (p < .001), military setting by 16.22 (p < .001), occupational health by 6.62 (p = .004), but did not differ significantly from the SNF, public, or academic settings. This indicates that PTs in the outpatient clinic environment are the most active in post-operative scar intervention. The lowest total score was in military facilities, which differed from all other settings except early intervention. The military setting differed from the academic setting by -12.21 (p < .001), hospital setting by -12.07 (p < .001), home health by -6.54 (p = .009), occupational setting by -9.59 (p < .001), private outpatient by -16.22 (p < .001), public outpatient setting by -15.14 (p < .001), and SNFs by 13.65 (p < .001), but did not differ from early intervention (see Figure 8). Discussion The literature has emphasized burn scars (Gibbs et al., 2019; Gibbs & Furney, 2013), but little can be found on how PTs evaluate or treat postoperative scars (Abd-Elseyad et al., 2022). The present study sought to characterize the KAP of PTs licensed in the U.S. to see if there are differences among those characteristics (i.e., sex, patient population, years of experience, board certification, practice region, and practice setting). The Postoperative Scar Survey was launched at the 2023 APTA CSM to obtain uniform data across varying PT demographics (Harvey, Ewen, Moore, & DeRu, in progress). The strong participation in the survey indicates that this topic is essential in physical therapy practice. Over 81% (n = 572) of therapists agreed that PTs should evaluate postoperative scars. This is a significant finding that warrants priority in PT education and practice. Generally, scoring higher in one KAP area resulted in a higher score in other areas. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 36 According to the APTA, females comprise 68% of the profession (APTA, 2023). Females scored higher than males across every domain except practices. Interestingly, women's health literature is the main area of scar treatment research (Comesaa et al., 2017; Crowle & Harley, 2020; Gilbert et al., 2022; Kelly et al., 2019; Kelly-Martin et al., 2018; Koller, 2020; Kramp, 2012; Martingano, 2016; Ocampo-Candiani et al., 2014; Wasserman et al., 2018). Women's health specialists also held the highest scores for every area except practice, where they were almost equal to wound specialists. The exact percentage is unknown, but more females act as women's health specialists, which may connect these findings. According to the APTA, 65% of board-certified specialists are female (APTA, 2023). Following the trend seen in KAP, women's health specialists had the highest scores. This may be due to the heightened nature of postoperative care in women's health populations with corresponding higher knowledge and attitude scores. Additionally, pelvic floor therapists would be poised to address comorbidities from scars among transgender or gender-diverse patients. This patient population is at risk for physical and emotional issues, requiring heightened attention to scar tissue comorbidities (Kamal & Keuroghlian, 2023). The patient's perception of their scars may also increase scar engagement in this demographic, especially with a high incidence of cesarean section, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. There is new insight regarding the connection between cesarean scars and function through the abdominal scar score, which can predict pelvic floor function after cesarean section (Yang et al., 2023). This research used the POSAS to assess the scar and a functional pelvic floor assessment (Yang et al., 2023). Scars are the result of wound healing. Board-certified specialists in wound care came in a close second to women's health specialists in KAP and total scores. Prioritizing scar tissue as an extension of a wound is a natural progression. Their specialty practice guidelines include scar POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 37 tissue management (APTA, 2020). Only 23 certified wound care specialists are currently in the country (APTA, 2023). In contrast, those with geriatric specialty certification scored the lowest across all domains, indicating that PTs specializing in this population may not prioritize scar tissue. Also, common barriers to healthcare in this population are limited finances and concern with quality of care (Kurichi et al., 2017). Limited accessibility or comorbidities could lessen attention to scars. Additionally, oncology and cardiovascular/pulmonary specialties scored low despite many surgical procedures in these patient populations. This could be due to the lifethreatening nature of the medical issues in this patient population, making postoperative scar tissue a lesser priority than functional outcomes. The patient population also had a significant bearing on scar engagement. PTs serving a diverse population of adult and pediatric patients scored higher across all domains, possibly indicating a broader scope of evaluation and treatment techniques. These therapists may better understand the impact of scar tissue on function as they see patients across their lifespan. In contrast, pediatric therapists scored the lowest. This is a significant finding since 70% of surgical scars or traumatic lacerations occur in the pediatric population (Krakowski et al., 2015) and may have an impact on motor skill development if not addressed (Harvey, 2022). Pediatric PTs approach practice more from a sensory-motor reference and may underestimate the physical and psychological impact of scars.' This is important as scars can impact physical and emotional development (Alvira-Lechuz et al., 2017; Duquennoy-Martinot et al., 2016; Harvey, 2022; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Matur, 2017; Takayuki & Ostry, 2010; Uher et al., 2018). They also come from a foundational neurologic focus, which could account for the lower scores. Additionally, there is limited research regarding approved scar tissue treatment techniques for pediatric populations. Generally, modalities are more accepted in the adult POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 38 population, with more research to support their safety and efficacy. Another consideration is that there may not be a long-term projection for the issues that scars can cause, physically and psychologically, in the pediatric population (Davies et al., 2016; Duquennoy-Martinot et al., 2016; Fu et al., 2019; Gilbert et al., 2022; Gottrand et al., 2016; Kelly et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2018; Olsson et al., 2018; Rullander, 2015; Vuotto et al., 2018; Wasserman et al., 2016). There may be a lack of understanding of the physiological healing in children, producing a scar with dense collagen that can disable and disrupt growth (Le Touze et al., 2020). The pediatric patient will grow physically with their scar. If fibrotic scar tissue is not addressed, traction can cause asymmetrical growth and disturbed motor development (Alvira-Lechuz et al., 2017; DuquennoyMartinot et al., 2016; Harvey, 2022; Le Touze et al., 2020; Lubczyska et al., 2023; Matur, 2017; Takayuki & Ostry, 2010; Uher et al., 2018). Massery (2009) has pioneered the implications of postural deformation from deep, visceral scars and body systems to function. Therapists practicing early intervention scored low across all domains, lending more power to this finding. This could be due to the prioritization of other therapeutic tasks or a lack of understanding of the long-term impact of scar tissue on physical and psychological outcomes for the patient, including a higher risk of body dysmorphia and suicide (Duquennoy-Martinot et al., 2016; Padilla-Espaa et al., 2014; Patel et al., 2014; Rullander, 2015). This could also be because pediatric therapists only see children and do not see them into adolescence or adulthood, where tethered tissues may cause pain, infertility, or other orthopedic issues. The survey showed that practice settings were significant for KAP. According to the U.S. Census, 42% of PTs practice in outpatient environments (APTA, 2023). Those in private and public outpatient settings have the highest total KAP scores, possibly indicating an interest in scar tissue treatment in this patient demographic. Patients getting outpatient therapy may place POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 39 higher importance on their scars, primarily in orthopedic or women's health-related procedures. Therapists in outpatient settings may better understand the impact of scar tissue on function and possess the manual skills and modalities to treat those issues. Other settings that would see many surgical procedures did not score as well. The military setting scored the lowest on all factors; however, it has a high incidence of surgery, with over 95,461 procedures annually (Dalton et al., 2022). There are many factors to consider in the military sector, including access, eligibility, and prevalence of comorbidities. A recent study showed that 53.8% of active service members and veterans choose to use other healthcare coverage over Veterans' Affairs (V.A.) services due to concerns with the quality of care, inconvenience, limited services, or red tape (Vankar, 2023). Those who do engage with the V.A. are increasingly complex with chronic medical issues ranging from cancer to diabetes (Rasmussen & Farmer, 2023). This could cause interventions to focus on more lifesaving measures and critical care. Additionally, the low scar engagement could be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and reported an overall reduction in access to direct care and surgical intervention, with a 36% reduction in surgical knowledge and skills compared to before the pandemic (Schoenfield et al., 2023). This is twice as high as trends in the civilian sector (Schoenfield et al., 2023). Additionally, a recent study showed that 33% of women do not engage with the V.A. for reasons such as trauma (especially sexual assault) and military-style versus healthcare feel (Evans et al., 2024). The female military population not seeking V.A. services could utilize public or private outpatient settings. If so, this could contribute to the higher scores among therapists in these settings. The 2021 U.S. Census shows that 3,475,888 military personnel and civilian support comprise our population, making this a significant problem (Department of Defense, 2021). POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 40 Lastly, years of experience and region of practice also had significance. More experience was significant in scores; those with more than 21 years in practice had higher knowledge scores, and those with 25 years had higher attitude scores. Surprisingly, those with less than five years of experience had the highest practice scores, which may be attributed to new PTs eager to apply new skills and explore modalities. This could also be due to the growing evidence of fascia and its interconnection with muscle function. While scar tissue assessment and treatment are not a core component of DPT programs, this could be due to the holistic approach to rehabilitation and a desire to account for the patients perception of their surgical scars. Therapists in the Western U.S. scored highest among all domains. This region boasts the highest number of PTs with specialty board certification, especially California (APTA, 2023). This elevated number of PTs engaging in specialty certification may account for the higher scores in this region. Physical therapists in the Midwest had the lowest total KAP scores. This could be due to many factors, including access to facilities, less dense population, or higher importance of other goals. More research is necessary to determine why there is less emphasis on scar tissue in this region. Study Limitations There were limitations in the current study. Though every effort was made for a fair and equal representation of PTs, the cross-sectional nature of the study limits the ability to generalize findings across all PTs (Wang & Chen, 2020). The survey is descriptive, and it is not possible to provide causal relationships, thus, further research is needed (Wang & Cheng, 2020). Additionally, survey revisions occurred after the pilot, but a second test pilot was not completed before launching the survey in 2023. The survey was also long, with 41 questions, taking an average of 15.7 minutes to complete. Dry needling is a treatment technique approved in many POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 41 states for PT use and is a modality used for scar treatment; however, this was not explored due to restrictions in some states. Future efforts should include this technique. Implications This study demonstrates the importance of postoperative scar engagement among U.S. PTs while showing differences among therapists' sex, patient populations, setting, region, specialization, and experience, which require further investigation. The survey highlighted underserved populations, mainly pediatric, geriatric, and military settings. The least-engaged settings were those supported by government funding, from Medicaid and Medicare to the V.A., while the most engaged are those receiving services from private or public outpatient settings, which may be due to access or finances. This highlights a potential health disparity in the treatment of scars. Wound care is a foundational component of DPT programs; however, scar management education is usually left to personal discretion. Physical therapists can apply for specialty board certification in wound management and fellowships or residencies in wound care, indicating that this type of treatment requires specific analysis and knowledge. As of 2023, there are only 23 PTs who hold wound care certification (APTA, 2023). Otherwise, therapists can take continuing education courses on scar management. This study showed that scar management is needed across diverse populations and stages of life. Since it applies to many patients, scar management could be woven into wound care education in DPT programs. Those with specialty certification in wound care could be leaders in this endeavor. Incorporating scar tissue management across stages of healing into DPT programs would equip students with assessment and treatment strategies across the lifespan. This could include a lack of patient interest or a higher prioritization of other goals due to limited time or support. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 42 While wound care is a critical education component, treating scar tissue is mainly left to continuing education efforts. With the overwhelming response from PTs, this topic should also hold crucial importance in the DPT programs, equipping the next generation. Pediatric PTs and the early intervention setting scored low across all KAP subscale scores. Future efforts should focus on developing a pediatric scar linear assessment to guide intervention research in this population, which is lacking in the literature. Specific education for these PTs should address recommendations to follow pediatric clients through adolescence to monitor for functional or psychological concerns during periods of rapid growth (Le DuquennoyMartinot et al., 2016; Touze et al., 2020), especially with the high occurrence of scars in this population (Krakowski et al., 2015). The military setting also requires targeted exploration to determine why engagement is limited. Understanding the obstacles to managing scar tissue in this setting would guide intervention or give support where necessary. A similar study is needed for therapists working in the geriatric population. More research should be conducted among geriatric specialists and settings, including the V.A., to understand the low levels of engagement. The Postoperative Scar Survey could clarify issues in these environments. Additionally, knowledge of scar tissue is included in the patient's goals and concerns to help guide interventions. Therapists in outpatient settings and those with women's health or wound care specialties scored high across domains and thus may be poised to lead the education efforts in this area as they are most engaged in scar tissue. Lastly, global consensus exists regarding burns (Agency for Clinical Innovation. 2017; Koyro et al., 2021) as well as wound management and scar prevention (Fernndez-Guarino et al., 2023; Monstrey et al., 2014; National Major Trauma Rehabilitation Group, n.d.). There are also POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 43 international guidelines for physical agents used in wound management, focusing on chronic open wounds to limit scars but not specific to the treatment of scars once the wound is closed (Fernndez-Guarino et al., 2023; Monstrey et al., 2014). Internationally, recently, recommendations have been made for the use of STM for patients who have had a cesarean section (Olszewska et al., 2023). There is also an emphasis on PTs using a multi-modality approach to scars, as healing depends on many factors (Fernndez-Guarino et al., 2023; Lubczyska et al., 2023). Identifying current U.S. practices among PTs engaged in scar treatment is critical to determining preferred assessments and modalities. Comparing U.S. practices to international PT practices regarding postoperative scars could bring a broader understanding. Experts could be identified to gain consensus on assessment and treatment techniques to develop professional guidelines. Conclusion This study is the first to provide an overview of how U.S. PTs engage with postoperative scar tissue. Looking at the summed total scores, PTs with the highest total score are female, treating a broad range of patients (both adult and pediatric), practicing in private outpatient settings, in the Western U.S., have more than 26 years of experience, and have specialty certification in women's health. The therapists least engaged are males, working with pediatric patients, practicing in the military setting, in the Midwest, with less than 26 years of experience, and with geriatric certification. While there is research on burn management, this is the first survey to assess PT engagement with postoperative scars. The recent revival of interest in muscle connections and myofascial chains has transitioned the rehabilitation model to a holistic view of the patient. Dr. Guimberteau's (2014) groundbreaking work in fascia demonstrated how everything is seamlessly connected POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 44 anatomically. This study shows more therapists have embraced assessing the whole person, looking for scars as a potential cause of disorders elsewhere. This is especially true of females; colleagues in women's health care and private practice with patients of all ages were more interested in looking at scars. The area most lacking in postoperative scar engagement is the military setting across all scores. This is followed closely by pediatric and geriatric populations. This new information may help to guide education towards demographics to encourage postoperative scar treatment. Understanding the preferred strategies of PTs, developing a pediatric assessment, and knowing barriers are critical in moving forward. From this research, the development of evidence-based treatment strategies across patient populations and settings, with an understanding of the impact of scars on function, should be emphasized. These efforts could result in practice guidelines for postoperative scar tissue assessment and treatment across patient populations and problems. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 45 References Abd-Elsayed, A., Pope, J., Mundey, D. A., Slavin, K. V., Falowski, S., Chitneni, A., Popielarski, S. R., John, J., Grodofsky, S., Vanetesse, T., Fishman, M. A., & Kim, P. (2022). Diagnosis, treatment, and management of painful scar: A narrative review. Journal of Pain Research, 15, 925937. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S355096 Adameyko, I. & Freid, K. (2016). The nervous system orchestrates and integrates craniofacial development: A review. Frontiers in Physiology, 7, Article 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00049 Agency for Clinical Innovation. (2017). Burn physiotherapy and occupational therapy guidelines. https:www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au Al Qarqaz, F., & Al-Yousef, A. (2018). Skin microneedling for acne scars associated with pigmentation in patients with dark skin. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 17(3), 390395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12520 Alster, T. S., & Li, M. (2020). Microneedling of scars: A large prospective study with long-term follow-up. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 145(2), 358364. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006462 Alvira-Lechuz, J., Espiau, M. R., & Alvira-Lechuz, E. (2017). Treatment of the scar after arthroscopic surgery on a knee. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 21(2), 328333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.07.013 Andrews, J. P., Marttala, J., Macarak, E., Rosenbloom, J., & Uitto, J. (2016). Keloids: The paradigm of skin fibrosis - Pathomechanisms and treatment. Matrix Biology, 51, 3746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2016.01.013 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 46 APTA. (2020). Increasing access to physical therapist services for wound care: Research on the value of physical therapy. https://www.apta.org/article/2020/10/30/analysisvaluephysical-therapy-wound-care Atkinson, J. A., McKenna, K. T., Barnett, A. G., McGrath, D. J., & Rudd, M. (2005). A randomized, controlled trial to determine the efficacy of paper tape in preventing hypertrophic scar formation in surgical incisions that traverse Langer's skin tension lines. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 116(6), 16481658. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000187147.73963.a5 Bae, S. H., & Bae, Y. C. (2014). Analysis of frequency of use of different scar assessment scales based on the scar condition and treatment method. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 41(2), 111115. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.111 Ballard, A., Khadra, C., Adler, S., Trottier, E. D., & Le May, S. (2019). Efficacy of the Buzzy Device for pain management during needle-related procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 35(6), 532543. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000690 Barati, K., Esfandiari, E., Kamyab, M., Ebrahimi Takamjani, I., Atlasi, R., Parnianpour, M., Yazdi, H., Shahali, S., & Bidari, S. (2021). The effect of local muscle vibration on clinical and biomechanical parameters in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 35, 124-133. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.124 Benito, E., Oliver, A., Glaiana, L., Barreto, P., Pascual, A., Gomis, C., Barbero, J. (2014). Development and validation of a new tool for the assessment and spiritual care of palliative care patients. Journal of Pain and SymPTom Management. 47(6); 1008-1018. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 47 Biology Dictionary. (2017). Mesoderm. https://biologydictionary.net/mesoderm/ Block, L, Gosain, A, & King, TW. (2015). Emerging therapies for scar prevention. Advances in Wound Care, 4(10), 607614. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0646 Bonati, L. M., Epstein, G. K., & Strugar, T. L. (2017). Microneedling in all skin types: A review. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 16(4), 308313. Brewin, M. P., Bexon, C. J., & Tucker, S. C. (2017). A case report on the use of vibration to improve soft tissue extensibility after major trauma. Journal of Hand Therapy, 30(3), 367371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2016.11.012 Brockmann R & Klein HM. (2018). Pain-diminishing effects of Kinesio taping after median sternotomy. Physiotherapy Theory Practice. 34(6):433-41. https://doi:10.1080/09593985.2017.1422205 Burton, L. J. & Mazerolle, S. M. (2011). Survey instrument validity part II: Validation of a survey instrument examining athletic trainers' knowledge and practice beliefs regarding exertional heat stroke. Athletic Training Education Journal. 6(1):36-45. Carrire, M. E., Kwa, K., de Haas, L., Pijpe, A., Tyack, Z., Ket, J., van Zuijlen, P., de Vet, H., & Mokkink, L. B. (2019). Systematic review on the content of outcome measurement instruments on scar quality. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open, 7(9). Article 6799398. https://doi/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002424 Celletti, C., Fara, M. A., Filippi, G. M., La Torre, G., Tozzi, R., Vanacore, N., & Camerota, F. (2017). Focal muscle vibration and physical exercise in postmastectomy recovery: An explorative study. BioMedical Research International, 17, Article ID 7302892, . https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7302892 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 48 Chapman, B. P. & Moynihan, J. (2009). The brain-skin connection: Role of psychosocial factors and neuropePTides in psoriasis. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, 5(6), 623-627. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2926975/ Cheatham, S. W., Baker, R. T., & Abdenour, T. E. (2021). Kinesiology tape: A descriptive survey of healthcare professionals in the United States. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 16(3), 778796. https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.22136 Cheatham, S. W., Lee, M., Cain, M., & Baker, R. (2016). The efficacy of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization: A systematic review. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 60(3), 200211. Chen, Z., Xin, N., Huang, K., Wei, R., Liu, C., Niu, S., Xu, Z., Ding, X., & Tang, H. (2022). A new traceless technique for cosmetic closure of minimally invasive incision and chest tube fixation after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Frontiers in Surgery, 9: Article 874983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.874983 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. (2018, September). Open-heart surgery in children. https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/health/o/open. Coentro, J. Q., Pugliese, E., Hanley, G., Raghunath, M., & Zeugolis, D. I. (2019). Current and upcoming therapies to modulate skin scarring and fibrosis. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 146, 3759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.08.009 Cohen, B. E., & Elbuluk, N. (2016). Microneedling in skin of color: A review of uses and efficacy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 74(2), 348355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.024 Comesaa, C. A., Surez Vicente, M. D., Docampo Ferreira, T., Prez-La Fuente Varela, M. D., Porto Quintns, M. M., & Pilat, A. (2017). Effect of myofascial induction therapy on post-c-section scars, more than one and a half years old. Journal of Bodywork and POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 49 Movement Therapies, 21(1), 197204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.07.003 Crowle, A., & Harley, C. (2020). Development of a biotensegrity focused therapy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective case series. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 24(1), 115125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.10.008 Dalton, M., Remick, K., Mathias, M., Trinh, Q., Cooper, Z., Elster, E, and Weissman, J. (2022). Analysis of surgical volume in military medical treatment facilities and clinical combat readiness of US military surgeons. JAMA Surgery. 57(1):43-57. https://doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5331 Dastagir, K., Obed, D., Bucher, F., Hofmann, T., Koyro, K. I., & Vogt, P. M. (2021). Noninvasive and surgical modalities for scar management: A clinical algorithm. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(12), Article 1259. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121259 Davies, C. C., Brockopp, D., & Moe, K. (2016). Astym therapy improves function and range of motion following mastectomy. Breast Cancer, 8, 3945. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S102598 Deflorin, C., Hohenauer, E., Stoop, R., van Daele, U., Clijsen, R., & Taeymans, J. (2020). Physical management of scar tissue: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 26(10), 854865. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109 De Groef, A., Van Kampen, M., Vervloesem, N., De Geyter, S., Dieltjens, E., Christiaens, M. R., Neven, P., Geraerts, I., & Devoogdt, N. (2017). An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability. PloS One, 12(6), Article 0179116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179116 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 50 De Groef, A., Van Kampen, M., Moortgat, P., Anthonissen, M., Van den Kerckhove, E., Christiaens, M. R., Neven, P., Geraerts, I., & Devoogdt, N. (2018). An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity. PloS One, 13(3), Article 0193915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193915 Duquennoy-Martinot, V., Belkhou, A., Pasquesoone, L., Depoortre, C., & Guerreschi, P. (2016). Scar revision in children: Clinical situations and solutions. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique, 61(5), 578588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2016.05.009 Dunning, J., Butts, R., Mourad, F., Young, I., Flannagan, S., & Perreault, T. (2014). Dry needling: a literature review with implications for clinical practice guidelines. Physical Therapy Reviews, 19(4), 252265. https://doi.org/10.1179/108331913X13844245102034 Eid & Abdelbasset, M. M., & Abdelbasset, W. K. (2022). Insight about different physical therapy techniques for management of hypertrophic scars. International Journal of Biomedicine, 12(2), 188192. https://doi.org/10.21103/Article12(2)_RA3 Evans, E. A., Tennenbaum, D. L., Washington, D. L., & Hamilton, A. B. (2024). Why women veterans do not use VA-provided health and social services: Implications for health care design and delivery. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 64(2), 251-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819847328 Feltroni, L. Monteleone, S, Petrucci, L, Carlisis, E, Mazzacane, B, Schieppati, M, and Toffola, E. (2018). Potentiation of muscle strength by focal vibratory stimulation on quadriceps femoris. Itialian Medical Ergonimics. 40(2), 90-96. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 51 Fernndez-Guarino, M., Bacci, S., Prez Gonzlez, L. A., Bermejo-Martnez, M., CeciliaMatilla, A., & Hernndez-Bule, M. L. (2023). The role of physical therapies in wound healing and assisted scarring. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(8), 7487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087487 Ferriero G., Vercelli S., Salgovic L., & Sartorio F. (2015). Adherent scars: Do they really exist? Wound Repair Regeneration. 23(2), 297-298. https://doi:10.1111/wrr.12276 Fijan, S., Frauwallner, A., Langerholc, T., Krebs, B., Ter Haar Ne Younes, J. A., Heschl, A., Mieti Turk, D., & Rogelj, I. (2019). Efficacy of using probiotics with antagonistic activity against pathogens of wound infections: An integrative review of the literature. BioMed Research International, Article 7585486. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7585486 Franchignoni, F., Giordano, A., Vercelli, S., Bravini, E., Stissi, V., & Ferriero, G. (2019). Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in linear scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 144(6), 1073e1079e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265 Fu, X., Dong, J., Wang, S., Yan, M., & Yao, M. (2019). Advances in the treatment of traumatic scars with laser, intense pulsed light, radiofrequency, and ultrasound. Burns & Trauma, 7, s41038-41041. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0141-0 Garcia K., Wray, J.K., and Kumar, S. Spinal cord stimulation. StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553154/ Gibbs, K. A., Bachman, T., Patrick, R., Spivey, S., and Gibbs, D. (2019). Early integumentary practice expectations experienced by two physical therapist graduate cohorts. Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy, 11(1): 44-51. https://doi: 10.1097/JAT.000000000000018 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 52 Gibbs, K. A., & Furney, S. R. (2013). The importance of integumentary knowledge and skill in physical therapist entry-level education: Are they prepared for practice? Journal of Allied Health, 42(1), 4045. Gilbert, I., Gaudreault, N., & Gaboury, I. (2022). Exploring the effects of standardized soft tissue mobilization on the viscoelastic properties, pressure pain thresholds, and tactile pressure thresholds of thecesarean section scar. Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine, 28(4), 355362. https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2021.0178 Gottrand, L., Devinck, F., Martinot Duquennoy, V., & Guerreschi, P. (2016). Contribution of the physical and rehabilitation medicine in pediatric plastic surgery. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique, 61(5), 589597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2016.07.00 Grigoryan, K. V., & Kampp, J. T. (2020). Summary and evidence grading of over-the-counter scar treatments. International Journal of Dermatology, 59(9), 11361143. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.15060 Hambraeus, M., Hagander, L., Arnbjrnsson, E., Brjesson, A., & Stenstrm, P.. (2020). Healthrelated quality of life and scar satisfaction in a cohort of children operated on for sacrococcygeal teratoma. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), Article 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01350-y Harvey, E.G. (2018). Neuroplasticity via therapeutic touch. NDTA Network, 25(4):22-24. Harvey, E. G. (2022). Kinesio taping to address post-sternotomy scars in pediatric patients: A case report. Scars, Burns & Healing, 8, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131221095355 Harvey, E. G., Macias-Harris, J., and Brown, K. M. (2017). A prospective study of the posture and sensory stimulation method using a touch, treat, tape approach (PaSS Method) to affect functional outcomes in children with dysphagia. NDT Network, 24(3):12-14, 16-23. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 53 Hosseini, M., Brown, J., Khosrotehrani, K., Bayat, A., & Shafiee, A. (2022). Skin biomechanics: A potential therapeutic intervention target to reduce scarring. Burns & Trauma, 10, Article tkac036, https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac036 Huang, C., & Ogawa, R. (2021). Keloidal pathophysiology: Current notions. Scars, Burns & Healing, 7, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120980320 Imtiyaz, S., Veqar, Z., & Shareef, M. Y. (2014). To compare the effect of vibration therapy and massage in prevention of delayed onset muscle soreness. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 8(1), 133136. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/7294.3971 Ishii, N., Ando, J., Kiuchi, T., Uno, T., & Kishi, K. (2021). Comparison of two types of tapes for taping after breast reconstruction using silicone materials. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 14(3), 305310. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_113_20 Jiang Q., Chen J., Tian, F., & Liu, Z. (2021). Silicone gel sheeting for treating keloid scars (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(9). Article CD013357. https://doi10.1002/14651858.CD013357.pub2. Kamal, K., Li, J. J., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2023). Addressing the physical and mental impacts of postsurgical scarring among transgender and gender diverse people. LGBT Health, 10(4), 259262. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2022.0308 Kantor J. (2017). Reliability and photographic equivalency of the scar cosmesis assessment and rating (SCAR) scale, an outcome measure for postoperative scars. JAMA Dermatology, 153(1), 5560. https://doi10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3757 Karwacinska, J, Kiebzak, W, Stepanek-Finda, B, et al. (2012). Effectiveness of Kinesio taping on hypertrophic scars, keloids, and scar contractures. Polish Annals of Medicine, (19):5057. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 54 Kelly, R. C., Armstrong, M., Bensky, A., Foti, A., & Wasserman, J. B. (2019). Soft tissue mobilization techniques in treating chronic abdominal scar tissue: A quasi-experimental single subject design. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 23(4), 805814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.04.010 Kelly-Martin, R., Doughty, L., Garkavi, M., & Wasserman, J. B. (2018). Reliability of modified adheremeter and digital pressure algometer in measuring normal abdominal tissue and Csection scars. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 22(4), 972979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.02.017 Klein, HM, Brockmann, R, Assmann, A. Pain-diminishing effect of Kinesio taping in patients after sternotomy. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2015;10(1): Article 76. http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/10/s1/A76 Koller T. (2020). Mechanosensitive aspects of cell biology in manual scar therapy for deep dermal defects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(6), Article 2055. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062055 Koyro, K., Bingl, A., Bucher, F., & Vogt, P. (2021). Burn guidelines: An international comparison. European Burn Journal. 2, 125-139. 10.3390/ebj2030010. Kramp M. E. (2012). Combined manual therapy techniques for the treatment of women with infertility: A case series. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 112(10), 680684. Krakowski, A. C., Totri, C. R., Donelan, M. B., & Shumaker, P. R. (2016). Scar management in the pediatric and adolescent populations. Pediatrics, 137(2). Article 20142065. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-2065. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 55 Kurichi, J. E., Pezzin, L., Streim, J. E., Kwong, P. L., Na, L., Bogner, H. R., Xie, D., & Hennessy, S. (2017). Perceived barriers to healthcare and receipt of recommended medical care among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 72, 4551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.05.007 Kurtti, A., Nguyen, J. K., Weedon, J., Mamalis, A., Lai, Y., Masub, N., Geisler, A., Siegel, D. M., & Jagdeo, J. R. (2021). Light emitting diode-red light for reduction of post-surgical scarring: Results from a dose-ranging, split-face, randomized controlled trial. Journal of Biophotonics, 14(7). Article 202100073. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202100073 Lauridsen M. H., Kristensen A. D., Hjortdal V. E., Jensen T. S., Nikolajsen L. (2014). Chronic pain in children after cardiac surgery via sternotomy. Cardiololy in the Young, 24(5):893899. https://doi:10.1017/S104795111300139X Le Touze, A., Tot, L, Mustoe, T.A., Middelkoop, E. (2020). Scars in pediatric patients. Textbook on scar management: State of the art management and emerging technologies. Springer. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK586080/ doi: 10.1007/978-3-03044766-3_46 Lee, J. S., Kim, J. P., Ryu, J. S., & Woo, S. H. (2018). Effect of wound massage on neck discomfort and voice changes after thyroidectomy. Surgery, 164(5), 965971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.029 Lemos, T. V., Albino, A. C., Matheus, J. P., & Barbosa, A. (2014). The effect of Kinesio taping in forward bending of the lumbar spine. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 26(9), 13711375. https://doi.org/10.1589/jPTPTs.26.1371 Lin, Y. S., Ting, P. S., & Hsu, K. C. (2020). Comparison of silicone sheets and paper tape for the management of postoperative scars: A randomized comparative study. Advances in Skin & Wound Care, 33(6), 16. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000661932.67974.7d POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 56 Lubczyska, A., Garncarczyk, A., & Wciso-Dziadecka, D. (2023). Effectiveness of various methods of manual scar therapy. Skin Research and Technology: International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin, 29(3), Article 13272. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13272 Mamalis, A. D., Lev-Tov, H., Nguyen, D.-H., & Jagdeo, J. R. (2014). Laser and light-based treatment of Keloids: A review. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 28(6), 689699. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12253 Manfredi, L. R. (2012). Effect of surface wave propagation on neural responses to vibration in primate glabrous skin. PLoS One. 7(2), Article 31203. Martingano D. (2016). Management of cesarean deliveries and cesarean scars with osteopathic manipulative treatment: A brief report. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 116(7), 2230. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2016.093 Masanovic M. G. (2013). Physical therapy for scars. Soins; la Revue de Reference Infirmiere, (772), 4143 Massery, M. (2009). The Linda Crane Memorial Lecture: The patient puzzle piecing it together. Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal. 20(2):19-27. Matur, Z., & ge, A. E. (2017). Sensorimotor integration during motor learning: Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. Noro Psikiyatri Arsivi, 54(4), 358363. https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2016.18056 McClellland, G. S. & Davidson, M. (2016). Physiotherapy management of patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery: A survey of Australian physiotherapists. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 44(2): 105112. https://doi:10.1561/NZJP/44.2.06McGlone, F., Wessberg, J., & Olausson, H. (2014). Discriminative and affective touch: Sensing and feeling. Neuron, 82(4), 737755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.001 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 57 Monstrey, S., Middelkoop, E., Vranckx, J. J., Bassetto, F., Ziegler, U. E., Meaume, S., & Tot, L. (2014). Updated scar management practical guidelines: Non-invasive and invasive measures. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 67(8), 10171025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.011 Moortgat, P., Ulrike, V., Mieke, A., Meirte, J., Lafaire, C. Lieve, C., Koen, M.. (2015). Tension reducing taping as a mechanotherapy for hypertrophic burn scars: A proof of concept. Annuls of Fires and Burn Diasasters, 28. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2961.4564. Moortgat, P., Meike, J., Meirte, J., Van Daele, U., & Koen, M. (2016). The physical and physiological effects of vacuum massage on the different skin layers: A current status of the literature. Burns Trauma, 4(34), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-016-0053-9 Moortgat P., Meirte, J., & Van Daele, U. (2020). Vacuum massage in the treatment of scars. In Tot, l., Mustoe, T.A., Middelkoop, E, & Gauglitz, G. G. (Eds.), Textbook on scar management: State of the art management and emerging technologies (ed., pp. 477-482). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44766-3_54 Mundy, L. R., Miller, H. C., Klassen, A. F., Cano, S. J., & Pusic, A. L. (2016). Patient-reported outcome instruments for surgical and traumatic scars: A systematic review of their development, content, and psychometric validation. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 40(5), 792800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0642-9 Nakagami G, Sanada H, Matsui N, et al. (2007). Effect of vibration on skin blood flow in an in vivo microcirculatory model. Bioscience Trends, 1(3), 161-166. National Major Trauma Rehabilitation Group. (n.d.). NMTRG Guidelines for the assessment and treatment of major trauma rehabilitation patient. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 58 https://www.c4ts.qmul.ac.uk/downloads/nmtrg/nmtrg-mdt-scarmanagementguidelines.pdf Ngaage M, & Agius M. (2018). The psychology of scars: A mini-review. Psychiatria Danubina, 30(7), 633638. Nesbitt J. J., Mori G., Mason-Apps C., Asimakopoulos G. (2017). Comparison of early and late quality of life between left anterior thoracotomy and median sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Perfusion, 32(1), 50-56. https://doi:10.1177/0267659116657166 Nischwitz, S. P., Rauch, K., Luze, H., Hofmann, E., Draschl, A., Kotzbeck, P., & Kamolz, L. P. (2020). Evidence-based therapy in hypertrophic scars: An update of a systematic review. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 28(5), 656665. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12839 Nishioka, H., Yasunaga, Y., Yanagisawa, D., Yuzuriha, S., & Ito, K. I. (2020). Where do you insert a drain tube during breast reconstruction? Surgery Today, 50(12), 16261632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02043-1 Nguyen, A. V. & Soulika, A. M. (2019). The dynamics of the skin's immune system. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(8), Article 1811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081811 Ocampo-Candiani, J., Vzquez-Martnez, O. T., Iglesias Benavides, J. L., Buske, K., Lehn, A., & Acker, C. (2014). The prophylactic use of a topical scar gel containing extract of Allium cepae, allantoin, and heparin improves symptoms and appearance of cesarean-section scars compared with untreated scars. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 13(2), 176182. Ogawa R. (2022). The most current algorithms for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids: A 2020 update of the algorithms published 10 years ago. Plastic and POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 59 Reconstructive Surgery, 149(1), 79e94e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008667 Ogawa, R., Dohi, T., Tosa, M., Aoki, M., & Akaishi, S. (2021). The latest strategy for keloid and hypertrophic scar prevention and treatment: The Nippon Medical School (NMS) protocol. Journal of Nippon Medical School, 88(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-106 Olsson, M., Enskr, K., Steineck, G., Wilderng, U., & Jarfelt, M. (2018). Self-perceived physical attractiveness in relation to scars among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A population-based study. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, 7(3), 358366. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2017.0089 Olszewska, K., Ptak, A., Rusak, A., Dbiec-Bk, A., & Stefaska, M. (2023). Changes in the scar tissue structure after cesarean section as a result of manual therapy. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Article 2451-2680. 10.17219/acem/169236. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/169236 O'Reilly, S., Crofton, E., Brown, J., Strong, J., & Ziviani, J. (2021). Use of tape for the management of hypertrophic scar development: A comprehensive review. Scars Burns & Healing. 7, 1-17. https://doi:10.1177/20595131211029206 Padilla-Espaa, L., del Boz, J., Ramrez-Lpez, M. B., & Fernndez-Snchez, M. E. (2014). Camouflage therapy workshop for pediatric dermatology patients: A review of 6 cases. Actas Dermo-sifiliograficas, 105(5), 510514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2013.10.004 Patel, L., McGrouther, D., & Chakrabarty, K. (2014). Evaluating evidence for atrophic scarring treatment modalities. Jornal of the Royal Society of Medicine Open, 5(9). Article 2054270414540139. https://doi.org/10.1177/2054270414540139 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 60 Pastouret, F., Cardozo, L., Lamote, J., Buyl, R., & Lievens, P. (2016). Effects of multidirectional vibrations delivered in a horizontal position (Andullation) on blood microcirculation in laboratory animals: A preliminary study. Medical Science Monitor Basic Research, 22, 115122. https://doi.org/10.12659/msmbr.900654 Poddighe, D., Ferriero, G., Corna, S., Bravini, E., Sartorio, F., & Vercelli, S. (2024). Effects of soft tissue mobilisation on subacute adherent linear scars: A single-group intervention study. Journal of Wound Care, 33(1), 4350. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.33.1.43 Poetschke, J., Schwaiger, H., & Gauglitz, G. G. (2017). Current and emerging options for documenting scars and evaluating therapeutic progress. Dermatologic Surgery, 43(1), 2536. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000698 Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. (2nd ed.). Pearson. Prusinowska, A., Turski, P., Cichocki, T., Kowalik, K., Woszuk, K., Madyk, P., & KsiopolskaOrowska, K. (2014). The use of Kinesio taping as a complementary therapy to conventional techniques in the rehabilitation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis following total knee arthroplasty. Reumatologia, 52(3), 193-199. https://doi.org 10.5114/reum.2014.44090 Rabello, F. B., Souza, C. D., & Farina Jnior, J. A. (2014). Update on hypertrophic scar treatment. Sao Paulo Clinics, 69(8), 565573. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2014(08)11 Ramaut, L., Hoeksema, H., Pirayesh, A., Stillaert, F., & Monstrey, S. (2018). Microneedling: Where do we stand now? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 71(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.006 Rasmussen, P., & Farmer, C.M. (2023). The promise and challenges of V.A. community care: POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 61 Veterans' issues in focus. Rand Health Quarterly, 10(3), 9-20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37333666/ Rozenfeld, E., Sapoznikov Sebakhutu, E., Krieger, Y., & Kalichman, L. (2020). Dry needling for scar treatment. Acupuncture in Medicine: Journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society, 38(6), 435439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964528420912255 Rullander, A. C., Isberg, S., Karling, M., Jonsson, H., & Lindh, V. (2013). Adolescents' experience with scoliosis surgery: A qualitative study. Pain Management Nursing, 14(1), 5059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2010.07.005 Schoenfeld, A., Ho, H., Schoenfled, R., Coles, C., & Koehlmoos, T. (2023). Changes in surgical volume in military medical treatment facilities and military surgeon clinical combat readiness during Covid-19 pandemic. Annals of Surgery, 4(3), e308-e310. https://doi:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000308. Scott, H. C., Stockdale, C., Robinson, A., Robinson, L. S., & Brown, T. (2022). Is massage an effective intervention in the management of postoperative scarring? A scoping review. Journal of Hand Therapy, 35(2), 186199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2022.01.004 Seffrin, C. B., Cattano, N. M., Reed, M. A., & Gardiner-Shires, A. M. (2019). Instrumentassisted soft tissue mobilization: A systematic review and effect-size analysis. Journal of Athletic Training, 54(7), 808821. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-481-17 Shin, T. M., & Bordeaux, J. S. (2012). The role of massage in scar management: A literature review. Dermatologic Surgery, 38(3), 414423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15244725.2011.02201.x Sidgwick, G. P., McGeorge, D., Bayat, A. (2015). A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring. Archives of POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 62 Dermatological Research: Founded in 1869 As Archiv Fur Dermatologie Und Syphilis, 307(6), 461477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-015-1572-0 Sitohang, I., Sirait, S., & Suryanegara, J. (2021). Microneedling in the treatment of atrophic scars: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. International Wound Journal, 18(5), 577585. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13559 Takayuki, I. & Ostry, D. J. (2010). Somatosensory contribution to motor learning due to facial skin deformation. Journal of Neurophysiology. 104(3),12301238. https://doi 10.1152/jn.00199.2010. Tu, S. J., Woledge, R. C., & Morrissey, D. (2016). Does Kinesio tape alter thoracolumbar movement during lumbar flexion: An observational laboratory study. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 20(4): 898-905. Uher, I., Pasterczyk-Szczurek, A., Bigosiska, M., & vedov, M. (2018). Vibration therapy and its influence on health. Biomedical Journal of Science and Technical Research. 6(5): 5449-5502. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2018.06.001406 Vankar, P. (2023). Percentage of U.S. vetrans and active service members of the Wounded Warrior Project who have never used V.A. health care services for select reasons in 2021. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1102115/reasons-veterans-and-activeservicemembers-do-not-use-va-primary-care provider/#:~:text=Of%20the%20veteran%20and%20active%20service%20members%20 who,coverage%20and%20too%20much%20trouble%20or%20red%20tape. Veqar, Z., & Imtiyaz, S. (2014). Vibration therapy in management of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 8(6), LE1LE4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/7323.4434 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 63 Vercelli, S., Ferriero, G., Sartorio, F., Cisari, C., & Bravini, E. (2015). Clinometric properties and clinical utility in the rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: A systematic review. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 38(4), 279286. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000134 Vuotto, S. C., Ojha, R. P., Li, C., Kimberg, C., Klosky, J. L., Krull, K. R., Srivastava, D. K., Robison, L. L., Hudson, M. M., & Brinkman, T. M. (2018). The role of body image dissatisfaction in the association between treatment-related scarring or disfigurement and psychological distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 27(1), 216222. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4439 Wananukul S, Chatpreodprai S, Peongsujarit D, Lertsapcharoen P. (2013). A prospective placebocontrolled study on the efficacy of onion extract in silicone derivative gel for the prevention of hypertrophic scar and keloid in median sternotomy wound in pediatric patients. Journal of the Medical Association of Thai, 96(11): 1428-1433. Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1S), S65S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012 Wang, Z. C., Zhao, W. Y., Cao, Y., Liu, Y. Q., Sun, Q., Shi, P., Cai, J. Q., Shen, X. Z., & Tan, W. Q. (2020). The roles of inflammation in keloid and hypertrophic scars. Frontiers in Immunology, 11, Article 603187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.603187 Ward, R. E., Sklar, L. R., & Eisen, D. B. (2019). Surgical and noninvasive modalities for scar revision. Dermatologic Clinics, 37(3), 375386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2019.03.007 Wasserman, J., Abraham, K., Massery, M., Chu, J., Farrow, A., & Marcoux, B. (2018). Soft tissue mobilization techniques are effective in treating chronic pain following cesarean section: A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Journal of Womens Health Physical POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 64 Therapy, 42(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000103. Wasserman, J. B., Copeland, M., Upp, M., & Abraham, K. (2019). Effect of soft tissue mobilization techniques on adhesion-related pain and function in the abdomen: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 23(2), 262269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.06.004 Wasserman, J. B., Steele-Thornborrow, J. L., Yuen, J. S., Halkiotis, M., & Riggins, E. M. (2016). Chronic caesarian section scar pain treated with fascial scar release techniques: A case series. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 20(4), 906913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.011 Weiser, T. G., Regenbogen, S. E., Thompson, K. D., Haynes, A. B., Lipsitz, S. R., Berry, W. R., & Gawande, A. A. (2008). An estimation of the global volume of surgery: A modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet, 372(9633), 139144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8 Wilgus, T. A., Ud-Din, S., & Bayat, A. (2020). A review of the evidence for and against a role for mast cells in cutaneous scarring and fibrosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(24). Article 9673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249673 Wilk, I., Kurpas, D., Mroczek, B., Andrzejewski, W., Okrglicka-Forysiak, E., KrawieckaJaworska, E., & Kassolik, K. (2015). Application of tensegrity massage to relive complications after mastectomy: Case report. Rehabilitation Nursing, 40(5), 294 304. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnj.142 Windisch, C., Brodt, S., Rhner, E., & Matziolis, G. (2017). Effects of Kinesio taping compared to arterio-venous Impulse System on limb swelling and skin temperature after total knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics, 41(2), 301307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3295-z POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 65 Wong F. (2021). First data in the process of validating a tool to evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare providers in oral care of institutionalized elderly residents: Content validity, reliability, and pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), Article 4145. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084145 Xu, H., Ren, S., She, T., Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Jia, T., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Modified technique of closing the port site after multiport thoracoscopic surgery using the shingled suture technique: A single center experience. Bio Medical Central Surgery, 21(1), Article 223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01220-4 Yang, Y., Yang, H., Ji, J., Zhao, Y., He, Y., & Wu, J. (2023). Predictive value of abdominal wall scar score for pelvic floor function rehabilitation, vaginal microecology and complications after cesarean section. PeerJ, 11, Article 16012. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16012 Zoumalan, C.I. (2018). Topical agents for scar management: Are they effective? Journal of Drugs & Dermatology, 17(4), 421-425. POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 66 Table 1 Sample Demographic Descriptive Statistics (N = 761) PT Characteristic N Frequency (%) Sex Male 398 52.2 Female 365 47.8 Adult 387 51.3 Pediatric 159 21.1 Adult and Pediatric 209 27.7 0-5 258 33.8 6-10 249 32.6 11-15 120 15.7 16-20 50 6.6 21-25 41 5.4 26-30 12 1.6 >30 33 4.3 None 122 16.0 Cardiovascular/Pulmonary 42 5.5 Clinical Electrophysiology 70 9.2 Geriatrics 46 6.0 Primary Patient Population Years in Practice Specialty Area Board Certification POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 67 Pediatrics 88 11.5 Neurology 52 6.8 Oncology 64 8.4 Orthopedics 76 10.0 Sports 36 4.7 Womens Health 29 3.8 Wound Management 126 14.2 South 190 24.9 Midwest 280 36.8 Northeast 162 21.3 West 129 17.0 Academic/Research Institution 117 15.4 Early Intervention 67 8.8 Hospital-based Facility 192 25.2 Home Health Services 80 10.5 Military Facility 40 5.2 Occupation Health Setting 55 7.2 Private Outpatient Clinic 115 15.1 Public Outpatient Clinic 54 7.1 Skilled Nursing Facility 40 5.2 Primary U.S. Region of Practice Primary Practice Setting Subscale Scores POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Knowledge 68 6.0 1.79 Attitude 29.62 5.52 Practice 32.57 5.72 Note. U.S. = United States POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 69 Table 2 Comparison of Knowledge Scores by Sample Demographics(N=755) N M SD Sex p < .001 Male 398 5.44 1.71 Female 364 6.51 1.88 Primary Patient Population < .001 Adult 387 6.18 1.91 Pediatric 159* 5.30 1.91 Adult and Pediatric 210 6.00 1.67 Years in Practice < .001 0-5 256 5.86 1.80 6-10 249 6.02 1.72 11-15 120 5.56 1.92 16-20 50 5.70 2.11 21-25 41 6.10 2.35 26-30 12 7.42 1.93 >30 33 7.18 1.53 Specialty Area Board Certification None < .001 117 6.09 1.93 Cardiovascular and Pulmonary 43 5.47 1.67 Clinical Electrophysiology 70 5.66 1.72 Geriatrics 46 4.87 1.75 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 70 Pediatrics 88 5.66 2.00 Neurology 52 4.90 1.81 Oncology 64 5.52 2.02 Orthopedics 76 5.91 1.79 Sports 36 5.50 1.46 Womens Health 29 7.28 1.33 125 6.22 1.34 Wound Management Primary Region of Practice in U.S. < .04 South 190 6.01 1.87 Midwest 280 5.84 1.92 Northeast 163 5.76 1.73 West 129 6.34 1.89 Primary Practice Setting Academic/Research Institution < .001 117 6.09 1.93 67 5.16 1.69 Hospital-based Facility 192 6.15 1.69 Home Health Services 80 5.24 1.71 Military Facility 40 4.80 1.94 Occupation Health Setting 55 5.36 1.76 Private Outpatient Clinic 115 6.79 1.73 Public Outpatient Clinic 55 6.56 1.42 Skilled Nursing Facility 40 6.0 1.48 Early Intervention Note. U.S. = United States POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 71 Comparison of Table 3 Attitude Scores by Sample Demographic (N = 750) N M SD Sex p < .001 Male 391 27.93 5.05 Female 359 31.49 5.44 Primary Patient Population < .001 Adult 382 30.42 5.70 Pediatric 157 27.24 5.11 Adult and Pediatric 205 29.93 5.04 Years in Practice < .001 0 to 5 253 29.70 5.00 6 to 10 245 29.45 5.26 11 to 15 118 28.30 5.66 16 to 20 50 29.16 6.61 21 to 25 40 29.60 6.92 26 to 30 12 32.58 5.76 >30 32 35.16 3.75 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 72 Specialty Area Board Certification None < .001 119 33.40 4.83 Cardiovascular/Pulmonary 42 27.33 4.89 Clinical Electrophysiology 67 27.18 5.06 Geriatrics 45 26.29 4.94 Pediatrics 88 28.34 5.30 Neurology 52 28.06 5.14 Oncology 62 28.02 6.18 Orthopedics 75 29.33 5.67 Sports 36 28.53 4.70 Womens Health 28 33.04 4.60 125 31.01 4.17 Wound Management Primary Region of Practice in U.S. < .001 South 184 29.61 5.58 Midwest 277 28.82 5.59 Northeast 162 29.79 5.31 West 127 31.27 5.29 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 73 Comparison of Primary Practice Setting <.001 Academic/Research Institution 115 30.33 5.46 Early Intervention 67 26.87 4.59 Hospital-based Facility 186 30.87 5.64 Home Health Services 79 27.16 5.29 Military Facility 39 24.21 3.43 Occupation Health Setting 54 27.72 4.71 Private Outpatient Clinic 114 32.11 5.14 Public Outpatient Clinic 55 31.02 4.43 Skilled Nursing Facility 40 30.13 4.59 Note. U.S. = United States Table 4 Practice Scores by Sample Demographic (N = 745) N M SD Sex .136 Male 391 32.45 5.93 Female 354 32.70 5.52 739 32.53 5.73 Adults 381 32.51 5.82 Pediatrics 154 29.75 5.82 Both Adults and Pediatrics 204 34.67 5.10 Primary Patient Population Years in Practice p <.001 <.001 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 74 0 to 5 251 33.76 5.17 6 to 10 245 32.87 5.67 11 to 15 119 30.69 6.02 16 to 20 50 30.24 5.62 21 to 25 38 32.47 5.79 26 to 30 12 30.75 5.12 30 years or more 30 31.70 6.72 Specialty Area Certification <.001 None 116 31.49 5.78 Cardiovascular and Pulmonary 41 31.06 5.64 Clinical Electrophysiology 69 32.06 6.58 Geriatrics 44 28.86 5.66 Pediatrics 86 31.60 5.80 Neurology 52 31.88 5.50 Oncology 62 30.63 5.99 Orthopedics 75 31.23 4.64 Sports 36 34.61 4.85 Womens Health 28 36.86 3.76 Wound Management 125 36.58 3.33 Total 734 32.54 5.74 Primary Region of Practice South <.001 183 68.20 10.95 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 75 Comparison of Midwest 272 66.28 10.99 Northeast 160 69.00 10.29 West 125 71.10 8.81 Primary Practice Setting <.001 Academic Research Institution 112 33.03 5.44 Early Intervention 66 29.71 6.09 Hospital-Based Facility 185 32.14 6.06 Home Health Services 79 31.28 5.51 Military Facility 39 28.23 4.86 Occupational Health Setting 55 33.82 5.56 Private Outpatient Clinic 113 34.33 5.04 Public Outpatient Clinic 55 34.55 4.63 Skilled Nursing 40 34.70 3.95 Table 5 Total Scores by Sample Demographic a (N=740) N M SD Sex < .001 Male 387 65.83 10.55 Female 353 70.70 10.09 734 68.12 10.63 377 69.18 10.62 Primary Patient Population Adults p < .001 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 76 Pediatrics 154 62.15 10.37 Both Adults and Pediatrics 203 70.67 9.12 Years in Practice < .001 0 to 5 249 69.35 9.31 6 to 10 244 68.33 10.22 11 to 15 118 64.62 11.18 16 to 20 50 65.10 11.97 21 to 25 38 68.42 13.68 26 to 30 12 70.75 11.19 30 years or more 29 74.62 9.88 Specialty Area Certification < .001 None 115 71.97 10.32 Cardiovascular and Pulmonary 41 63.95 9.75 Clinical Electrophysiology 66 65.21 10.97 Geriatrics Pediatrics 44 86 60.22 65.53 9.54 10.73 Neurology 52 64.85 9.60 Oncology 62 64.16 12.36 Orthopedics 75 66.45 9.45 Sports 36 68.64 8.57 Womens Health 28 77.21 7.90 Wound Management 124 73.83 6.62 Primary Region of Practice < .001 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 77 Comparison of South 183 68.20 10.95 Midwest 272 66.28 10.99 Northeast 160 69.00 10.29 West 125 71.10 8.81 Primary Practice Setting < .001 Academic Research Institution 112 69.39 10.22 Early Intervention 66 61.76 10.16 Hospital-Based Facility 183 69.25 10.13 Home Health Services 79 63.72 10.41 Military Facility 39 57.18 7.87 Occupational Health Setting 54 66.78 10.19 Private Outpatient Clinic 112 73.40 9.45 Public Outpatient Clinic 54 72.31 8.27 Skilled Nursing Facility 40 70.83 7.74 Note. U.S. = United States POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP a The higher the score, the greater the involvement with postoperative scars. 78 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Figure 1 Mean Average Knowledge Score by Specialty Board Certification (N = 750) Figure 2 Mean Average Knowledge Score by Practice Setting (N = 750) 79 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Figure 3 Mean Average Attitude Score by Specialty Board Certification (N = 750) 80 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Figure 4 Mean Average Attitude Score by Practice Setting (N = 750) 81 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Figure 5 Mean Average Practice Score by Specialty Certification (N = 750) 82 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Figure 6 Mean Average Practice Score by Practice Setting (N = 750) 83 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 84 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP Figure 7 Mean Average Total Score by Practice Setting (N = 750) Figure 8 Mean Average Total Score by Specialty Certification (N = 750) 85 POSTOPERATIVE SCARS KAP 86 ...